Laserfiche WebLink
i <br /> IEnhanced Bioremediation <br /> I The infection of air, oxygen, or hydrogen peroxide can be used to support aerobic biodegradation <br /> and enhance natural biological activity that degrades the CIO"' T hese may be introduced as <br /> gases or as a reactive chemical in a liquid or solid matrix form Additional nutrients (e g , <br /> phosphorus and nitrogen) may also be required to increase the natural bioactivity to levels <br /> sufficient to degrade the CDCs within a preferred zone or time frame This technology can be <br /> used for both impacted soil and groundwater Systems to deliver the required additives and <br /> I nutrients typically require moderate to high maintenance since the growth of biomass can clog <br /> the injection systems <br /> Soil samples collected from site bonngs were previously submitted for physicochemical and <br /> microbiological analyses The analyses revealed very low viable recoveries for heterotrophic <br /> and selective microorganisms at the dilutions tested The results suggested the possibility that <br /> some level of biotoxicity may exist at the site Further bench scale studies, to test for the effects <br /> of oxygen and nutrients on the stimulation of selective microbes,were recommended to assess <br /> the potential for enhanced bioremediation Enhanced bioremediation may be a viable option for <br /> the site <br /> 4.2 Technologies Screening Summary <br /> Three of the fourteen technologies screened were deemed feasible for remediation of both the <br /> impacted soil and groundwater at the site These technologies included In-Situ Air Spargmg, In- <br /> lie Situ Well Aeration, and Enhanced Bioremediation A comparison of each technology in terms of <br /> effectiveness, implementability, and long-term management requirements is presented below <br /> Enhanced bioremediation, as an in-situ treatment, appears feasible to meet the remedial <br /> objectives at this site Enhanced bioremediation can be implemented using temporary well <br /> points (e g , Geoprobe or Hydropunch) to infect the required nutrients into the soil and <br /> groundwater The nutrients would be infected along the approximate centerline of the <br /> groundwater plume This option would be the least intrusive, as surface based treatment <br /> equipment is not required and temporary well points are used for nutrient infection Operation <br /> Iand maintenance costs would be moderate to high and periodic monitoring of the site conditions <br /> would be required Characteristics that should be investigated prior to system design include <br /> aquifer permeability, site hydrology, dissolved oxygen content, pH, redox conditions, <br /> temperature, soil moisture content, organic content,biodegradability of contaminants, and the <br /> presence of a competent biodegrading population of microorganisms Enhanced bioremediation <br /> may be classified as a long-term technology that may take several years to reach cleanup goals <br /> Treatibility tests, especially for the soil matrix, should be performed to further determine the <br /> feasibility of this technology and to define the remediation time frame and parameters Typical <br /> costs for enhanced bioremediation of soils range from $20 to $80 per cubic yard For <br /> groundwater, oxygen enhanced treatment typically ranges from $40 to $80 per 1,000 gallons <br /> treated, hydrogen peroxide enhancement costs are an order of magnitude more expensive than <br />' oxygen enhancement, and nitrate enhancement ranges from $160 to $230 per gallon <br />' 4EGU�w <br /> 8 J <br /> I �LlCES�= <br />