My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010151
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SHAW
>
1500
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545688
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010151
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/21/2020 4:11:37 PM
Creation date
5/21/2020 10:11:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010151
RECORD_ID
PR0545688
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003634
FACILITY_NAME
CANTEEN CORPORATION
STREET_NUMBER
1500
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SHAW
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
14326008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1500 N SHAW RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
272
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
observation well MW-13A (0 1 feet), located approximately 16 feet from the sparge well Water <br /> levels measurements at the end of the sparge test (23 5 hours) had equilibrated to within 0 01 to <br /> 0 03 of a foot of initial readings, indicating that water levels in the nearby diverting canal may <br /> have had some influence on the water level measurements collected during the pilot test <br /> The dissolved oxygen measurements showed no consistent trends during the pilot test (Table 5), <br /> therefore, the data was not used as a determining factor in predicting the radius of influence <br /> Graphs of pressure influence, VOC concentrations, water levels, and dissolved oxygen versus <br />' time were also prepared and are presented in Appendix F <br /> In each of the monitored parameters, except for dissolved oxygen content, a response was <br /> I measured in both observation wells MW-13 and MW-13A (Table 5) A comparison of the data <br /> indicates that the responses were less pronounced in MW-13A than m MW-13 This is <br /> apparently due to both the greater distance from the sparge well (MW-13 @ 9ft and MW-13A @ <br /> 16 ft) and the location of the screen sections (MW-13 @ 39-59 ft and MW-13A @ 71-76 ft) <br /> Based on the measured responses in these wells, both a vertical and horizontal influence was <br /> produced across the unsaturated zone during the pilot test <br /> Combined Air Sparge/Soil Vapor Extraction Test <br />' A combined soil vapor extraction/air sparge pilot test was performed using VE-1 as a vapor <br /> extraction well and IAS-1 as an infection well The pilot test was operated at three different <br /> extraction and infection rates Existing monitor wells MW-1, MW-3A, MW-4, MW-13, and <br />' MW-13A and newly installed dual completion well VE-2 were used as observation wells during <br /> the test (Table 6) The monitoring points were selected to provide multi-directional data at <br /> varying distances from the infection point Vacuum and flow readings were measured with <br />' magnehelic gauges Off-gas concentrations were measured with a PID prior to treatment with <br /> the VACLEAN unit One off-gas sample was collected in a Tedlar bag at the end of the <br />' combined pilot test for laboratory analysis <br /> The combined soil vapor extraction/air sparge pilot test determined that a net vacuum was <br /> maintained at approximately 30 feet from the SVE well at a vacuum of 92 inches w c and a <br />' sparge pressure of 3 psi The results are presented in a graph(Appendix F) showing the pressure <br /> versus distance from the SVE well This data documents the capture of the air sparge off-gases <br />' within the design SVE radius of influence <br /> The off-gas analytical results showed a TPH(g) concentration of 62,000 ug/L, a benzene <br />' concentration of 85 ug/L, and a total BTEX concentration of 8,345 ug/L A copy of the <br /> analytical report is included in Appendix G Based on the analytical results, approximately 11 <br /> pounds of hydrocarbon vapors per hour (lbs/hr) were extracted from VE-1 during the combined <br /> t test <br /> 4.4 Recommended Remediation Technology <br /> 1 The results of the air sparge/soil vapor extraction pilot test indicated this is a feasible treatment <br /> technology for the impacted soil and groundwater at this site The results of the Enhanced <br /> 1 6G �o <br /> 13 <br />' 7C V-5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.