Laserfiche WebLink
18 November 1996 <br /> AGE-NC-Project No 95-0134 <br />' Page 6 of 8 <br /> initially run using the masses of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes for ground water at depths of 40 <br /> and 50 feet and using the mass of TPH-g with ground water at depths of 40 feet and 50 feet Benzene <br /> was not detected in any of the soil samples analyzed Therefore, benzene was not used in the <br /> modeling When all parameters were entered using the best available data, SESOIL predicted that <br /> no contaminants would impact ground water for the first four models <br /> A request was made to examine the potential impact to ground water, if ground water were to return <br /> to the 1986 seasonal high of 35 feet Approximately five feet of impacted soil would be in contact <br /> with ground water The volume of hydrocarbons was calculated for impacted soils below a depth of <br /> 35 feet The total volumes of toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes were defined as a release to ground <br /> water over the area of impacted soils for the fifth model A degradation rate of zero was used for the <br /> fifth model The concentrations of contaminants in ground water at the down-gradient edge of the <br /> Irelease was predicted using the AT123D A sixth model was run using the degradation rates from <br /> an example model supplied in the SESOIL program <br /> For the fifth and sixth models, the predicted concentrations for ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes <br /> would be below the state drinking water standards of 680, 100, and 1,750 ppb, respectively Using <br /> degradation rates, concentrations would decrease more rapidly Ethylbenzene, toluene and xylenes <br /> would decrease to below laboratory detection limits after 4 years, 3 years and 9 years, respectively <br /> for the sixth model <br /> The seventh model was run using the volume of TPH-g below a depth of 35 feet as a release to <br /> ground water with a receptor well at the down-gradient edge of the release The eighth model was <br /> run using the data from model seven and placing the receptor well 10 feet down-gradient The <br /> SESOIL modeling was described in the Quarterly Reports for May 1995, September 1995 and <br /> September 1995 Addendum, prepared by AGE SESOIL input data and output graphs are included <br /> as Appendix B <br /> 27 WELL SURVEY <br /> In accordance with requirements for site closure of underground tank sites, a survey was conducted <br /> to locate ground water receptors within two thousand feet of the subject site Lists identifying <br /> municipal wells in the Stockton area were obtained from the California Water Service Company <br />' (CalWater) and the City of Stockton Municipal Utilities Department One well was identified to be <br /> within the search radius Well No 28-01,maintained by CalWater, is located at the northwest corner <br /> of Fremont Street and Sierra Nevada Street, approximately 1,100 feet south of the subject site <br /> I CalWater Well No 53-01 is located approximately 2,200 feet southwest of the site No surface water <br /> features are located within the search radius Municipal well locations are shown on Figure 7 <br />