My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010345
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SIERRA NEVADA
>
749
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545690
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010345
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/22/2020 11:34:12 AM
Creation date
5/22/2020 11:24:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010345
RECORD_ID
PR0545690
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0005203
FACILITY_NAME
GENOVA BAKERY
STREET_NUMBER
749
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SIERRA NEVADA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15107406
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
749 N SIERRA NEVADA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
vapor well near the center of the contaminant plume for remediation A vapor extraction <br /> system (VES) was installed in August 1991 and was operated under permit requirements of <br /> the San Joaquin Air Pollution Control District order number 91-61 <br /> 2.3 Remediation <br /> Remediation began in 1991, and progress has been summarized in reports submitted <br /> between March 1992 and February 1993 At the end of 1992, the VES had operated for <br /> approximately 8,884 hours, and the mean hydrocarbon vapor concentration at the inlet was <br /> approximately 500 ppm From the end of 1992 to July 1993, the VES was in operation for <br /> approximately 90 percent of the time, bringing the total operational hours to 13,500 <br /> vapor Hydrocarbon or concentrations were measured at the inlet to the VES, using a <br /> Y P <br /> photoionization detector (PID), on a weekly basis to monitor the removal of hydrocarbons <br /> from the soil Vapor samples were collected on February 22 and April 28, 1993 for <br /> laboratory analysis The sample results were then correlated with the field readings This <br /> information was used to determine the volume and efficiency of hydrocarbon removal The <br /> results of the samples were described in a Quarterly Report dated July 17, 1993 <br /> 2.4 Regulatory Meeting <br /> On August 20, 1993, representatives of GeoAudit met with Mr Ronald Bruno, representing <br /> Genova Bakery, and Mrs Margaret Lagono of the PHS/EHD, to discuss further assessment <br /> and remediation activities A decision was made to re-start the vapor extraction motor and <br /> monitor vapor levels closely for several days to determine whether additional benefit could <br /> be obtained by continuing to operate the system <br /> The combustion unit was re-started and operated from September 20 to September 26 and <br /> E again from November 8 to December 7, 1993 The unit was shut-off on December 7, 1993 <br /> and has not operated since <br /> Using data obtained from the air samples collected during the first half of 1993, actual <br /> concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons were calculated to be 43% of the PID readings <br /> The last five PID readings ranged from 145 ppm to 242 ppm, this theoretically represents <br /> actual petroleum hydrocarbon concentrations of 62 ppm to 104 ppm The concentration of <br /> vapors removed from the soil at the site during the re-start period (from September to <br /> November) was not significant It appeared that the continued operation of the vapor <br /> extraction unit would not significantly enhance soil mitigation at the site We recommended <br /> that the unit be permanently disconnected and vapor extraction at the site terminated <br /> 2.5 Additional Soil and Groundwater Investigation <br /> Seven groundwater monitoring wells had previously been installed on or near the site The <br /> wells were installed to depths of 55 feet At the time of installation, groundwater depth was <br /> OwWpsl A.dn&. m,I.. 4 <br /> at—0.6ryQW7MI <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.