Laserfiche WebLink
the VES has been in operation and the rate at which vapors were <br /> withdrawn: <br /> removed HC = mean PID value x . 43 x hours x cu ft/min x 60 min/hr <br /> I The total volume of removed hydrocarbons is thus the sum of the <br /> volumes for each time interval . The volume calculated in this way <br /> is 19 , 314 cu ft of hydrocarbon vapors . <br /> 1 4 . 5 Current Rate of Hydrocarbon Extraction <br /> 1 The current rate of extraction can be determined by multiplying the <br /> the PID reading by the rate of vapor withdrawal and the <br /> PID/hydrocarbon ratio: <br /> . 000450 x 65 cu ft/min x . 43 = . 0125 cu ft/min <br /> 5. 4 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Comparison of hydrocarbon vapors measured at the VES inlet with the <br /> concentration of vapors measured in actual gas samples indicates <br /> that actual concentrations are roughly 43 percent of those measured <br /> at the inlet. If it can be assumed that this ratio has remained <br /> constant throughout the 2-year operation of the VES, the initial <br /> concentration in the inlet stream when operation started was <br /> approximately 1075 ppm, and the present concentration is <br /> approximately 100 ppm. This value cannot be directly related to <br /> the TPH concentration remaining in place with present data. <br /> Prior field experience with vapor extraction has shown that vapor <br /> extraction systems become less efficient as hydrocarbon <br /> concentrations decline. When concentrations decline below 100 ppm, <br /> most of the remaining hydrocarbons are long-chain, heavy molecules <br /> that do not volatilize readily. Further operation of the system is <br /> of little benefit This pattern is evident in Figure 3 , which <br /> shows that the rate of decline of vapor concentrations has <br /> decreased considerably over time and is now almost flat. Continued <br /> operation of the VES would probably not be cost-effective and is <br /> unlikely to result in significant further reductions In hydrocarbon <br /> contamination. <br /> GeoAudit recommends that representatives of Genova Bakery request <br /> a meeting with San Joaquin PHS/EHD to discuss termination of the <br /> operation of the VES. The meeting could also be used to discuss the <br /> overall status of the remediation effort prior to proceeding. <br /> I <br /> • 6 . 0 LIMITATIONS <br />` Our professional services were performed using that degree of care <br /> and skill ordinarily exercised by environmental consultants <br /> 4 <br />