Laserfiche WebLink
r '0 <br />Occidental Chemical Company <br />Page -2 <br />31 April 1980 <br />It is therefore incumbent upon us, both as the regulator and the regulated, <br />that wells be destroyed properly, as the drilling components are withdrawn, <br />and not at some later time. The destruction process must be inspected, and <br />is therefore an incurred cost offset by permit fees; and also fulfills <br />statutory requirements. Permits are required for each well boring. <br />2. The requirement for "neat cement" destruction of each well has been con- <br />tested upon the basis that unspecified unconfined aquafers may be present <br />in the substrata, thus making prescribed destruction mentods an exaggerated <br />exercise in great expense without commensurate benefit. No data of substance <br />has been provided to substantiate the contestation. What little data that <br />has been provided, does indicate that momentous variations occurs in con- <br />ductivity, ammonia content, and sulfates at variable aquafer levels. No <br />foreknowledge of such variabilities, or their significance is possible, and <br />until the project is completed, and scientific data is produced, protection <br />of aquafers from consequential affects of the project remains this agency's <br />paramount concern and statutory responsibility. <br />Soil characteristics which are now known, in respect to previous wells which have <br />been drilled in the project lead to a conclusion that total contiguous destruction <br />of the nonpermanent, uncased, wells is mandatory, and the requirement remains. <br />Slight technological modifications of the preestablished requirements, as iterated <br />in our 15 February 1980 letter (copy enclosed) are indicated; they are in augmentation: <br />a. All "pilot" wells shall be destroyed under permit and concurrent inspection <br />when, and during, the drilling components are withdrawn, by way of a Tremie <br />tube (or pipe) through which either neat cement (or nine sack mixture) <br />which has been 1/4" - 1/2" screened (on site), isup mped from the most <br />distal depth of the well, (without freefall) to the most proximal ground <br />level surface. <br />This requirement alters item (4) in the 15 February 1980 letter. <br />b. All other cased - well grouts shall be installed as approved under <br />permit procedures. <br />c. The requirements of item (5) in the 15 February 1980 letter are augmented <br />to require submission of quantified weigh or invoice manifests of materials <br />for each well, within two calendar weeks of the use of the destruction <br />materials. <br />