My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOWLAND
>
16777
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0009015
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE_FILE 1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2020 12:27:33 PM
Creation date
5/26/2020 10:13:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1
RECORD_ID
PR0009015
PE
2960
FACILITY_ID
FA0004094
FACILITY_NAME
J R SIMPLOT (OCCIDENTAL CHEMICAL)
STREET_NUMBER
16777
STREET_NAME
HOWLAND
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
LATHROP
Zip
95330
APN
19818005
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
16777 HOWLAND RD
P_LOCATION
07
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
TSok
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
411
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r '0 <br />Occidental Chemical Company <br />Page -2 <br />31 April 1980 <br />It is therefore incumbent upon us, both as the regulator and the regulated, <br />that wells be destroyed properly, as the drilling components are withdrawn, <br />and not at some later time. The destruction process must be inspected, and <br />is therefore an incurred cost offset by permit fees; and also fulfills <br />statutory requirements. Permits are required for each well boring. <br />2. The requirement for "neat cement" destruction of each well has been con- <br />tested upon the basis that unspecified unconfined aquafers may be present <br />in the substrata, thus making prescribed destruction mentods an exaggerated <br />exercise in great expense without commensurate benefit. No data of substance <br />has been provided to substantiate the contestation. What little data that <br />has been provided, does indicate that momentous variations occurs in con- <br />ductivity, ammonia content, and sulfates at variable aquafer levels. No <br />foreknowledge of such variabilities, or their significance is possible, and <br />until the project is completed, and scientific data is produced, protection <br />of aquafers from consequential affects of the project remains this agency's <br />paramount concern and statutory responsibility. <br />Soil characteristics which are now known, in respect to previous wells which have <br />been drilled in the project lead to a conclusion that total contiguous destruction <br />of the nonpermanent, uncased, wells is mandatory, and the requirement remains. <br />Slight technological modifications of the preestablished requirements, as iterated <br />in our 15 February 1980 letter (copy enclosed) are indicated; they are in augmentation: <br />a. All "pilot" wells shall be destroyed under permit and concurrent inspection <br />when, and during, the drilling components are withdrawn, by way of a Tremie <br />tube (or pipe) through which either neat cement (or nine sack mixture) <br />which has been 1/4" - 1/2" screened (on site), isup mped from the most <br />distal depth of the well, (without freefall) to the most proximal ground <br />level surface. <br />This requirement alters item (4) in the 15 February 1980 letter. <br />b. All other cased - well grouts shall be installed as approved under <br />permit procedures. <br />c. The requirements of item (5) in the 15 February 1980 letter are augmented <br />to require submission of quantified weigh or invoice manifests of materials <br />for each well, within two calendar weeks of the use of the destruction <br />materials. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.