Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 1 <br /> PC : 8-6-87 <br /> VR-86-5/UP-86-6 <br /> Page 4 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> In the last two years, the Planning Division has reviewed the <br /> Christian Life Center project on several occasions. <br /> The first project consultation took place in April 1985 with a <br /> preapplication conference. <br /> The next significant consultation did not occur until the end of <br /> June 1986, when the formal applications were submitted to the <br /> Planning Division. The Planning Division completed its prelimi- <br /> nary project and environmental reviews for the applications sub- <br /> mitted and then informed the applicant , in August 1986, that <br /> additional information would have to be provided before the <br /> Planning Division could consider recommending a Negative <br /> Declaration as the appropriate environmental documentation for <br /> the project . No additional information was submitted until May <br /> 1987 . <br /> In the period between August 1986 and May 1987 , the development <br /> outlook for the project and the vicinity changed dramatically. <br /> In the November 1986 general election, voters authorized the <br /> City of Stockton to assume land use planning jurisdiction over <br /> approximately 3 , 500 acres of land located in the unincorporated <br /> County. Three of the approved locations - containing a total <br /> of 650 acres - are located in the project vicinity. One <br /> includes 520 acres located along both sides of Morada Lane, <br /> between State Route 99 and the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks. <br /> A second ballot measure, Measure F, containing 64 acres, was <br /> approved for the Christian Life Center site. Measure E approved <br /> the 65-acre area located on the south side of Hammer Lane, <br /> directly opposite the Christian Life Center site. This site <br /> is to be used for expansion of the Stockton Auto Center, which <br /> has developed within the City of Stockton and is provided with <br /> public City services. The November 1986 election was followed <br /> y five important events: <br /> 1 . The City of Stockton commissioned cumulative traffic impact <br /> and fiscal impact studies to identify problems and solutions <br /> for the development that is now foreseeable in the Stockton <br /> area. <br /> 2 . The owner of the Stockton Auto Center expansion site ini- <br /> tiated the steps necessary for development within the City of <br /> Stockton and is now in the process of preparing a Draft <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the expansion proposal . <br />