Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 1 <br /> PC: 8-6-87 <br /> VR-86-5/UP-86-6 <br /> Page 8 <br /> The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) normally requires <br /> that proposed development occur within the City in order to <br /> receive the full range of City services, including sewer and <br /> water. The LAFCO comment letter for this project also notes, <br /> however, the possibility of project development within the <br /> County and subsequent annexation to the City. <br /> AREA/NEIGHBORHOOD COMPATIBILITY: <br /> Land Use: <br /> If the Variance were denied, a church could still be built on <br /> the site. In other words, there are no special physical cir- <br /> cumstance affecting the site which require a Variance. The <br /> site contains 46 acres, has a flat topography, is presently <br /> undeveloped, and is surrounded by buildings that do not exceed <br /> the 35-foot height limit of the RR zone. Granting of the <br /> requested height Variance would constitute a special privilege <br /> in addition to the special height allowance to 75 feet already <br /> granted by the Planning Title for quasi-public buildings. <br /> Surrounding land uses include agriculture to the west and <br /> north, the East Bay Municipal Utility District (EBMUD) along <br /> the north property line, the State Route 99 West Frontage Road <br /> along the east property line, a restaurant and motel to the <br /> southeast, and residences along the south property line on <br /> Moreland Street and Hammer Lane. The project could have an <br /> adverse effect on the existing residential neighborhood. Land <br /> use conflicts would be magnified as additional rural residen- <br /> tial development occurs west and north of the site. <br /> Traffic Circulation: <br /> The project will generate substantial traffic volumes over the <br /> existing local transportation network: Hammer Lane, State <br /> Route 99 Frontage Roads, and State Route 99/Hammer Lane <br /> interchange. <br /> Omni-Means, the applicant ' s traffic consultant, projects that <br /> improvements to the local transportation system will be <br /> required for both project traffic and cumulative area traffic. <br /> For the initial project stage, which involves relocation of the <br /> existing congregation only, the consultant recommends the <br /> widening of Hammer Lane to create an east-bound left-turn lane <br /> at the project entrance. Completion of a new church, in <br /> itself , will generate a larger congregation that currently <br /> exists. For cumulative area traffic demands, which does not <br /> include the nonproject land approved in the November 1986 elec- <br /> tion, the consultant recommends the following improvements: <br />