Laserfiche WebLink
Item No. 5 <br /> PC : 7-2-87 <br /> VR-86-5/UP-86-6 <br /> Page 4 <br /> STAFF ANALYSIS <br /> BACKGROUND: <br /> The County Planning Division has been reviewing the Christian <br /> Life Center project for more than two years. <br /> The first project consultation took place in April 1985 with a <br /> preapplication conference. <br /> The next significant consultation did not occur until the end of <br /> June 1986, when the formal applications were submitted to the <br /> Planning Division. The Planning Division completed its prelimi- <br /> nary project and environmental reviews for the applications sub- <br /> mitted and then informed the applicant , in August 1986, that <br /> additional information would have to be provided before the <br /> Planning Division could consider recommending a Negative <br /> Declaration as the appropriate environmental documentation for <br /> the project . No additional information was submitted until May <br /> 1987 . <br /> In the time that lapsed in the period between August 1986 and May <br /> 1987 , the development outlook for the project and the vicinity <br /> changed dramatically. In the November 1986 general election, <br /> voters authorized the City of Stockton to assume land use <br /> planning jurisdiction over approximately 3 , 500 acres of land <br /> located in the unincorporated County. Three of the approved <br /> locations - containing a total of 650 acres - are located in the <br /> project vicinity. One includes 520 acres located along both <br /> sides of Morada Lane, between State Route 99 and the Southern <br /> Pacific Railroad tracks. A second ballot measure, Measure F, <br /> containing 64 acres, was approved for the Christian Life Center <br /> site. Measure E approved the 65-acre area located on the south <br /> side of Hammer Lane, directly opposite the Christian Life Center <br /> site. A 65-acre site is to be used for an expansion of the <br /> Stockton Auto Center, which developed within the City of Stockton <br /> and is provided with public City services. The November 1986 <br /> election was followed by five important events: <br /> 1 . The City of Stockton commissioned cumulative traffic impact <br /> and fiscal impact studies to identify problems and solutions <br /> for the development that is now foreseeable in the Stockton <br /> area. <br /> 2 . The owner of the Stockton Auto Center expansion site ini- <br /> tiated the steps necessary for development within the City of <br /> Stockton and is now in the process of preparing a Draft <br /> Environmental Impact Report for the expansion proposal . <br />