My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010194
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SONORA
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010194
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 5:36:37 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 4:31:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010194
RECORD_ID
PR0545695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003877
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #2
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SONORA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13731025
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 W SONORA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
104
PDF
View images
View plain text
9&e r <br /> A S S O C I A T E S I N C <br /> would require considerable capital outlay Additional costs to the client would be incurred for <br /> permitting, leasing, and installing the vapor extraction equipment and treatment compound, and <br /> operation and maintenance of the system The cost of flus alternative is estimated to be <br /> between$140,000 and$220,000 <br /> ♦ Cntenon 5 <br /> This alternative should effectively remediate subsurface contaminants to acceptable regulatory <br /> levels within 6 months to 2 years of implementation <br /> ♦ Cntenon 6 <br />' The long term effectiveness for soil remediation would be good depending upon the degree of <br /> contaminant removal Groundwater would be monitored periodically until soil and <br /> groundwater is remediated to ensure that concentrations of petroleum hydrocarbons are being <br />' reduced <br /> ♦ Criterion 7 <br />' This alternative has some minor unplementability problems due to the time involved in <br /> obtaining permits from the APCD for the vapor extraction system Permitting could take as <br /> much as 180 days depending upon APCD work load, but is typically completed in 60 to 90 <br /> days <br /> ♦ Cntenon 8 <br />' Impact to the site occupants and surrounding businesses during installation and other site <br /> activities will be moderate This method has been shown to be effective and regulatory <br /> acceptance is expected <br /> 7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> 1 Based on the soil and groundwater data compiled and included in this technical report, ATC <br /> Associates recommends in-situ air sparging with soil vapor extraction for remediation of the <br /> petroleum hydrocarbons beneath the site The natural attenuation and groundwater extraction <br /> with soil vapor extraction alternatives have slower rates of removal, appear to be more costly in <br /> the long run, and will not likely be acceptable to the regulatory agency Upon regulatory <br />' concurrence of the preferred remedial action method and client approval, ATC Associates will <br /> prepare and submit a final remediation plan which includes a conceptual design of the remediation <br /> system <br /> 1 <br /> 1 W 162574 011pdot-fs report doe 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).