My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010277
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SONORA
>
110
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545695
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010277
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/27/2020 5:15:02 PM
Creation date
5/27/2020 4:43:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010277
RECORD_ID
PR0545695
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0003877
FACILITY_NAME
CITY OF STOCKTON FIRE STATION #2
STREET_NUMBER
110
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
SONORA
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95203
APN
13731025
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
110 W SONORA ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
8 i $ <br /> V�K <br /> A S s d C I A T E S I ISI C <br /> Based on groundwater elevations measured on December 14, 1999, the direction of groundwater flow <br /> is generally toward the east-northeast at an approximate gradient of 0 002 ft/ft The direction of <br /> groundwater flow has ranged from southeast to northeast since groundwater monitoring was initiated <br /> in December 1988 <br /> ' 3.0 PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL WORK <br /> ' Previous subsurface investigations performed included drilling seventeen soil borings, installing <br /> five groundwater monitoring wells (MW-1 through MW-5), seven vapor extraction wells (VW-1, <br /> VW-2s, VW-2d, VW-3, VW-4, VW-5s, and VW-5d), one piezometer (PZ-1), and one recovery <br /> ' well (RW-1), collecting and analyzing soil and groundwater samples, and monitoring fluid levels <br /> in the wells Quarterly groundwater monitoring was initiated at the site in December 1988 The <br /> locations of monitoring wells and pertinent site features are shown on Figure 2 A summary of <br /> ' well construction details is included in Table 1, a summary of monitoring data is included m Table <br /> 2, and a summary of laboratory analytical results is included in Table 3 <br /> ' In 1992, RESNA Industries Inc performed a groundwater aquifer test and performed a soil vapor <br /> extraction test (VET) A second VET was performed in January 1994 A complete summary of <br /> the pilot testing results and previous environmental work performed on site is contained in <br /> 4 RESNA Industries Inc 's Final Remediation Plan for Soil and Groundwater Remediation, dated <br /> November 17, 1994 RESNA recommended groundwater extraction and vapor extraction as a <br /> ' final remediation plan for impacted soil and groundwater at the site Copies of vapor extraction <br /> test monitoring data are included in Appendix B <br /> ' In January 1996, at the request of the City of Stockton, the site was reevaluated based on the <br /> release of a Lawrence Livermore report which recommended natural attenuation as a remedial <br /> alternative at petroleum hydrocarbon sites and the Final Remediation Plan was never <br /> ' implemented In May 1998, PHS/EHD requested that an air sparge/vapor extraction pilot test be <br /> performed at the site to evaluate the feasibility of using these methods to remove dissolved <br /> gasoline hydrocarbons from groundwater beneath the site In October 1998, ATC submitted a <br /> ' workplan to PHS/EHD which was subsequently approved with minor modifications <br /> On November 23, 1998, a vapor extraction test was performed by ATC using vapor well VW-1 <br /> ' as the vapor extraction point while monitoring vacuum response in the surrounding wells The <br /> test was approximately 15 hours in length Flowrates, applied vacuums, influent and effluent <br /> ' volatile organic compound (VOC) concentrations, and temperatures were also monitored during <br /> the test Vapors were extracted using an internal combustion (IC) engine equipped with a 5-hp <br /> blower and a moisture knockout chamber Two influent vapor samples and one effluent vapor <br /> ' sample were collected during the test Results and field readings from the short-term vapor <br /> extraction are included in Appendix B <br /> During the Lvapor extraction test, extraction flowrates ranging from,47 to 57 cubic feet per minute <br /> (cfm) resulted in vacuums of up to 0 8 inches of water to vadose wells VW-5s and VW-2d located <br /> W 162574 011CAP report doe 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.