Laserfiche WebLink
San Joaquin County DIRECTOR <br /> Pp N Donna Heran, REHS <br /> Environmental Health Department ASSISTANT DIRECTOR <br /> ti 2< 600 East Main Street Laurie Cotulla,RENS <br /> Stockton, California 95202-3029 PROGRAM COORDINATORS <br /> •` Mike Huggins,RENS, RDI <br /> c ''•' tNW.S OV,OC eMargaret Lagorio,REHS <br /> Website: W <br /> j / hd <br /> g g Robert McClellon,REHS <br /> Phone: (209)468-3420 ,teff Carruesco,RENS,RDI <br /> Fax: (209) 464-0138 Kasey Foley,REHS <br /> 10 February 2009 <br /> David A Rosso <br /> Stockton Center Site Authority <br /> 401 Golden Shore, Second Floor <br /> Long Beach CA 90802 4210 <br /> Subject: California State University Stanislaus <br /> 1252 N. Stanislaus Street <br /> Stockton, CA 9520 <br /> The San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department (EHD) has reviewed Second <br /> Quarter(Semi-Annual) Groundwater Monitoring Report—June 2008 (the QR), dated 17 October <br /> 2008, prepared and submitted by your consultant, Condor Earth Technologies, Inc. (Condor). <br /> The EHD also reviewed various data from your site to evaluate its characterization status and <br /> future assessment, monitoring or remediation requirements for obtaining site closure. <br /> The QR reports the analytical results for monitoring wells MW-3, MW-5, MW-6, MW-7, MW-8 <br /> and MW-9; monitoring wells MW-1, MW-2, and MW-4 were not sampled, but were intended to <br /> be sampled during the December 2008 monitoring event. Total petroleum hydrocarbons <br /> quantified as gasoline (TPH-g) was detected in two well samples, MW-3 and MW-8, <br /> at concentrations of 77.9 micrograms per Liter (pg/L) and 82.2 pg/L, respectively. <br /> 1,2-Dichloroehtane (1,2-DCA) was detected in two well samples, MW-7 and MW-8, at 4.6 pg/L <br /> and 4.7 pg/L, respectively. Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as kerosene (TPH-k), as <br /> diesel (TPH-d), or as motor oil (TPH-mo), and the aromatic hydrocarbons benzene, toluene, <br /> ethylbenzene and total xylenes (BTEX) were not detected in any of the well samples. <br /> The recent monitoring data combined with previously obtained site investigation data show that <br /> the plume of impacted groundwater has been adequately delineated in the shallow zone (25 to <br /> 49 feet below surface grade [bsg]) north of the assumed source area underlying the former <br /> underground storage tank (UST) pit by MW-1, toward the northwest by CPT-4, probably toward <br /> the southwest by MW-2, toward the south by CPT-6, toward the southeast by MW-3 and MW-6, <br /> and toward the east-northeast by MW-5. <br /> The deeper zone investigated, approximately 85 to 90 feet bsg, is adequately characterized by <br /> MW-9 and CPT-4 toward the northwest, CPT-6 toward the south, CPT-7 toward the southeast, <br /> and CPT-5 toward the east-northeast. <br /> The vertical extent of 1,2-DCA is delineated by CPT-8 as shallower than 96 and 128 feet bsg; <br /> however the vertical extent of TPH-g and BTEX in the former UST area is not so clearly <br /> delineated; the EHD suspects that deeper grab groundwater samples were cross contaminated <br /> by more intensely impacted shallow groundwater. TPH-g and BTEX have not been detected at <br /> Comment and Directive Letter 0209 <br />