My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011955
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
STANISLAUS
>
1252
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545699
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0011955
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 10:07:56 AM
Creation date
5/28/2020 9:55:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0011955
RECORD_ID
PR0545699
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0010903
FACILITY_NAME
CSU STANISLAUS MULTI CAMPUS REGIONA
STREET_NUMBER
1252
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
STANISLAUS
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95202
APN
13921008
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
1252 N STANISLAUS ST
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I b <br /> I <br /> i <br /> TABLE OF CONTENTS <br /> k <br /> 1.0 INTRODUCTION...................................................:......................................................................1 <br /> BACKGROUND ............................................................................ <br /> 2.0 PROJECT ••••.........................1 <br /> 3.0 DIRECT PUSH BORING FIELD PROCEDURES......................................................................3 <br /> 3.1 SITE PREPARATION...................................................................................................................3 <br /> '.' 3.2 DIRECT PUSH BORING PROCEDURES ....................................................................................3 <br /> 4.0 MONITOR WELLS —FIELD METHODS..................................................................................4 <br /> ................ <br />' <br /> 11 4.1 SITE PREPARATION........................ ••••4 <br /> 4.2 DRILLING PROCEDURES ..........................................................................................................4 <br /> 4.3 MONITOR WELL SURVEYING, DEVELOPMENT, ANDSAMPLING.....................................4 <br /> 5.0 LABORATORY ANALYSES.......................................................................................................5 <br /> 6.0 REMEDIAL FEASIBILITY EVALUATION................................................ ........................6 <br /> 6.1 DESCRIPTIONS, JUSTIFICATIONS, AND TIME,FOR PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION <br /> STRATEGIES ••..6 r <br /> 6.2 COMPARATIVE COST ANALYSIS ......................... ...... 7 <br /> . � I <br /> 6.3 EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVES ...........................8 <br /> 6.4 PROPOSED TARGET CLEAN-UP LEVELS AND VERIFICATION PROCEDURES................. I <br /> r <br /> 7.0 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................................................ ............... ' ......9 <br /> -8.0 REPORTING............................... ..............................................................................................9 , <br /> i;9.0 PROJECT SCHEDULE...................................... ....................................................................10 <br />' APPENDICES ; <br /> :APPENDIX A <br /> Figure 1 Vicinity Map <br /> Figure 2 Site Map with Proposed Direct Push Boring Pair Locations <br /> 'APPENDIX B <br /> i Table A Historical Groundwater Sample Analytical Data <br /> Table B Historical Soil Sample Analytical Data <br /> I Table C Itemized Cost Analysis for Excavation and Removal Alternative <br /> Table D Itemized Cost Analysis for SVE and Groundwater Pump and Treat Alternative <br /> E � <br /> I <br /> i <br /> i; <br /> i n CONDOR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.