| 
								    																				�I
<br />     					Ain
<br />     													_f'relitninary Investigation and Evaluation Report.[
<br />     													4k,:.CSUS Multi C',114
<br />     																	Regional Center  "
<br />    																	r    try� �o'o _
<br />   					-       	_ 											Page 3
<br /> 															_   		c.btu 	1.
<br />   	�	r  																,  _
<br />     		jdriven three feet, the..conical tip_was:withdrawil-and.tlie core barrel:was.driven'an-additional 2 feet,_-
<br />    		,;resulting in a 2-foot sample at-five-foot intervals:The,satii  le liner,was extracted fioinahe core barrel and.       	=.
<br />   																		-  .
<br />+
<br />     		used for geologic logging_iuid field-observations. All soiI-sampies were logged according to the Unified -
<br />  	T .
<br />    		`Soil Classification System Geologic logs were prepared containiria field observations including soi-i type,
<br />    		.,estimated moisture content;photoionization detector'-(PID)-measurements, and the presence_of staining or
<br />     		odor.:The geologic logs are included,in Appendix B.---     - 			-
<br />     		Each,soiI sample=was cut from the Finerat the selected-depth for potential-laboratory analysesThe soil
<br />     		1samples were-retained, undisturbed, -in the liners.-The liners were sealed at-the ends 'with. Teflon®
<br />       =  																_   =
<br />  '  		sheeting, capped  wrapped witlizdtict tape, and labeled.:Th`e`sai�iples were stored in.a_cooler chilled with
<br />     		;Blue lce1 ,and-delivered under,,cliairi-of custody_procedures to=Exeelchean;Env iroiimental Laboratories;_
<br />    		'Inc."of'Ro.seville, California�The sajples"were analyzed; using U:S:—EPA     ihods.,andCalifornia
<br />    		.approved-methods .   -      								5.
<br />     		3.2.2    Groundwater.Sainpl><ng     �
<br />     		One groi>ndwater-grab sample- was.-66 llected from each boring:�Teinporary well screens of '/4-in-ch       T .
<br />    		diameter, PVC'slofted casing-were installcd.dowri�to the bottom of each boring  A groundwater sampleIF
<br />     		W as retrieved2.from  within  the  temporary`well. screen  with-a =length  of clean,, 3/8-inch  diameter:,- .
<br />     		polyethylene tubing with acheck=valve"at the bottom -The tubing was putnpetf itp and down by_f�andao      	4
<br />     		draw`gioundwater up the tubing; The groundwater u ample was dischargeddii-ectly from the tubing-into
<br />     		laboratory-supplied :sample containers�_AII groundwater sample corttamers were sealed,=labeled; and
<br />+[       _   	placed in a cooler chilled wi#h Blue lee® and delivered under chain-of-custody procedures to Excelchem       	-.-
<br />     		Environmental Laboratories, lnc-. of Roseville, -California..The sarriples were analyzed_using U.S- EPA_
<br />      -   	s Methods and California-approved methods._
<br />     		3.3     :LABORATORY ANALYSES.      		-
<br />		`
<br />    		'The snit and groundwater-samples collected from all the borings_were analyzed for Methyl tertiary,Butyl
<br />     		Ether(MTBE).and benzene;toluene;ethyl benzene; and total xylenes (BTEX}by EPA-Method 8020 and
<br />    		for total extractable-petroleum hydrocarbons (TEPH) girantified �as�ker  ene'       , diesel and motor ,oil and
<br />     		total petr-oleurn hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline (TP,H G)T'  EPA Method 8015m. In addition, the' -  '�
<br />    		groundwater'-sam'ple.=col lected-from  boring: GP-3,. installed of-the approximate center of the former		-
<br /> -.-...      	location of TK€0,-was analyzed-forgasoline oxygei�atesladditi.ves by EPA=Method 8260 and fol totaldead
<br />     		by EPA.Method 6010.-The,gasoliile oxygenates/additive's include=MTBE, Ethanol `tertiary-Butanol, Di
<br />     		isopropyl ether (.DIFF);` Ethyl-tertiary-Butyl Ether '(ETBE),' tertiary-amyl';-Methyl Ether.(TAME),  1,2
<br />     		Dtchloroethane (l 2-6CA),and:1,2-Dibromgethane(ethylene dibromide--EDB)       		-		-
<br />    		4.0 INVESTIGATION RESULTS'    										_
<br />    		-The results of-the soil and'-grouudwater investigation include field observations (PIDsamplescreening
<br />      -     	results, detection_of sample odors,`and visual_observations'of-site-geology) and y oil.and-groundwater- _ x-77
<br />     	-   >sample laboratory analytical results. E a'boratory analytical.reports and-char-of custody recordsfor the 	'.
<br />    		samples are included-in Appendix C.
<br />   											-       						s
<br />    		4.1      FIELD OBSERVATIONS   			.-     								n.
<br />     		Field observations included_P1D�screen1ng-results, detection of sample.odors;""Tand visual observations of;
<br />    		w   a     					_											v
<br />    		the site geology. Field obseiwations;are included on th'Eii geologic logs-prepared=for-ail of-the--borings=_       .
<br />   		-(Appendix .B). Geoprobe0
<br />       						_b_'i    GP-1 was advanced to approximately 42�feet bgs Ms Dat Lofstroni'of
<br />    		the San Joaquin-County		was on-site to observe the advancement of GP=1  The walk;plan 		_
<br />    		Anticipated the:borings would.be advanced toepth.a total dof-approximately 30 feetbgs or reftsai.=A
<br />      									-       f
<br />    																		CONDOR---r ..    Y
<br />
								 |