Laserfiche WebLink
%MW <br /> Mike Infurna IEHI <br /> From: Marcus Pierce [mpierce@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 11:39 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: California Army National Guard Site <br /> The CANG site has been in SLIC for several years. Management decided it was easier to set <br /> up reimbursement for our oversight charges if it was placed in SLIC. Duncan is not <br /> familiar with this site because he is not the Senior responsible for it. Its confusing, <br /> but even though Dincan is the Senior responsible for the overall SLIC program, there are <br /> two other Seniors that are responsible for a portion of the SLIC sites. My Senior (John <br /> Russell) runs the DoD program, but also has about a dozen SLIC sites. I hope this clears <br /> up some of the confusion. <br /> Anyway, yesterday you were strongly urging me to take over the whole LANG site (you cited <br /> how often Wendy Cohen had done it in similar circumstances) , but I was reluctant to add it <br /> to my workload. I thought about our conversation after we got off the phone and agree <br /> that the site should be consolidated under one agency, even if I need to transfer it to <br /> someone else in our Cleanup section who may have more time to stay on top of the RP. If <br /> you are having second thoughts about your urging - let me know. <br /> I am not trying to rush your letter to CANG, just want to give you the opportunity to <br /> voice your concerns. I doubt that my comment letter will be issued this week too, so can <br /> you email the phone number for Major Koop's replacement. I just want to discuss CANG's <br /> past performance on the project and let him know there are letters headed his way from us. <br /> Thanks. <br /> Marcus L. Pierce <br /> Engineering Geologist <br /> CVRWQCB <br /> 916-464-4733 <br /> [MY EMAIL ADDRESS HAS CHANGED TO: mpierce@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> »> "Mike Infurna [EH] " <MInfurna@sjcehd.com> 08/23/05 09:56 AM >>> <br /> WHOA. . . color me slightly confused, but ok. . <br /> So this is NOT a SLIC site. . ? <br /> After our call yesterday, I just called Duncan Austin and he was sorta surprised to hear <br /> of your note that the site was no longer DOD but SLIC. He said he had to talk to John <br /> anyway this morning and would get back to me with the details. .If you can, check with <br /> Duncan and update him too please. with the phone call only 10 minutes ago, I may have <br /> succeeded in confusing him completely. . <br /> As for my letter, I was planning on issuing a directive to sample and monitor the wells at <br /> AAFS and start a gw investigation at OMS/Armory. With your new plans, I 'll modify my <br /> letter to NOT include any directives, list my concerns with the USTs and notify the RP <br /> that the UST portions of both parcels is being referred to the CVRWQCB. . .I 'll try to start <br /> my letter this week. <br /> this OK with you? <br /> -----Original Message----- <br /> From: Marcus Pierce [mailto:mpierce@waterboards.ca.gov] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 9:46 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Cc: John Russell <br /> Subject : California Army National Guard Site <br /> Hi Mike, <br /> I have completed my review of the latest report and we will be issuing comments. There are <br /> areas of the LANG Site that may warrant NFA, but I think they should install additional <br /> monitoring wells and collect more groundwater data before we consider closing potential <br /> 1 <br />