My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
242
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545704
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 10:58:04 AM
Creation date
5/28/2020 10:50:32 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0545704
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0009999
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UEX54/UE9AJ
STREET_NUMBER
242
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
Stockton
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
242 N SUTTER ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
174
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
P.O. Box 4353, Mountain View, CA 94040-4353 <br /> HYDRO-GEO CONSULTANTS, INC. (650) 428-0588 • FAX (650) 428-0589 <br /> February 15, 2002 <br /> Project 2267-E <br /> San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department [Ert2 YE D <br /> 304 East Weber Avenue, Third Floor fJ 1] l` V <br /> Stockton, California 95202 FEB 1 9 2002 <br /> Attention: Ms. Lori Duncan, Senior REHS ENVIRONMENT hCkLTH <br /> PERMIT/SERVICES <br /> RE: 01/31/02 Geoprobe Investigation, 242 N. Sutter Street, Stockton, CA. <br /> Dear Lori, <br /> Hydro-Geo Consultants, Inc. sent an application and permit fee for the three geoprobes, <br /> two on-site and one offsite, to the San Joaquin County Environmental Health Department <br /> on January 16, 2002. At that time we notified the Environmental Health Department that <br /> we were going to install the probes on January 31, 2002. We also sent an application and <br /> permit fee for an encroachment permit to the City of Stockton at the same time. On <br /> January 24, 2002 you telephoned and said that you could not issue the permit until we <br /> had obtained a permit from the City of Stockton for the offsite probe. We contacted the <br /> City and were issued the permit on January 30, 2000, we asked them to notify the County <br /> Health Department that we had the necessary permit; apparently, this was not done. We <br /> though that everything was approved and we had a permit to proceed with the scheduled <br /> work on January 31, 2002, because all of the necessary information for the two on-site <br /> probes had been submitted on January 16 and we had obtained the necessary City permit <br /> for the offsite probe on January 30. <br /> We very much regret this misunderstanding and assume total responsibility for telling <br /> Vironex, Inc., the drilling contractor, that we had a permit. Vironex's work is highly <br /> professional and they take great care in following procedures to prevent any <br /> contamination of the aquifer by immediately sealing the probes with neat cement and <br /> cleaning up the site at the completion of their work. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.