Laserfiche WebLink
Quarterly Report - First Quarter 2004 <br /> SUTTER OFFICE CENTER <br /> 242 North Sutter Street, Stockton, California <br /> 1.0. INTRODUCTION <br /> At theTER Advanced eoEnvironmental <br /> request of Ms Juh Lozano of the BUTTER OFFICE CEN nc d d a e G , <br /> Inc (AGE)has prepared this quarterly report for 242 North Sutter Street in Stockton,California(the <br /> site) The scope of work Included conducting a quarterly ground water monitoring event and <br /> preparation of this report The site setting is Illustrated on Figure 1 Site structures, soil boring and <br /> monitoring well locations are depicted on Figure 2 <br /> This report was prepared in accordance with Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board <br /> (CVRWQCB)guidelines for the investigation of underground storage tank(UST)sites Site history <br /> and findings from previous Investigations and monitoring events are provided in Appendix A <br /> 2.0. PROCEDURES <br /> On 12 March 2004,ground water monitoring was performed at on-site wells MW-1 through MW-3 <br /> The investigation was conducted in accordance with the CVRWQCB and the San Joaquin County <br /> Environmental Health Department(EHD) guidelines for the subsurface investigation of UST sites <br /> and sampling of ground water monitoring wells <br /> 2 1 WELL MONITORING AND PURGING <br /> The depth to ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well casing to the nearest <br /> 0 01 foot utilizing a Solmst water level meter The ground water elevation was calculated by <br /> subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation (Table 1) <br /> Due to a vehicle parked over well MW-3,a ground water sample was not collected from well MW-3 <br /> After water levels were measured, disposable, dedicated bailers were used to purge the wells <br /> Approximately 4 and 6 gallons of ground water(equivalent to three casing-water volumes)of water <br /> were purged from the two wells Temperature,pH and conductivity were measured for stabilization <br /> at regular purge-volume intervals using an Oakton water analyzer Field data and logs are provided <br /> in Appendix B Purged groundwater was containerized in 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site, <br /> pending proper disposal <br /> 22 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br /> . Water samples were collected from the monitoring wells using the dedicated,disposable bailers after <br /> allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80%recovery of the pre-purge water volume The sample <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />