My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010511
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
242
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545704
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010511
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 11:11:30 AM
Creation date
5/28/2020 10:56:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010511
RECORD_ID
PR0545704
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0009999
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UEX54/UE9AJ
STREET_NUMBER
242
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
Stockton
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
242 N SUTTER ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
172
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
S17 October 2003 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 02-0964 <br /> Page 8 of 8 <br /> • The up-gradient and cross-gradient (south) limits of petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil <br /> and ground water have been determine The vertical and down-gradient lateral extent of <br />' petroleum hydrocarbon-impacted soil and ground water has not been defined, at this time <br /> 50. RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> Based on the results of this and previous investigations, AGE recommends <br /> • Continued quarterly monitoring of site <br /> • Additional assessment of the lateral and vertical extent of hydrocarbon-impacted soil and <br /> ground water in the vicinity of the former Standard Oil USTs, and in the City of Stockton <br /> Right of Way east of the site <br /> I0 Once the impact to soil and ground water impact has been delineated, a work plan should be <br /> prepared for feasibility testing to evaluate various remedial alternatives at the site <br />�w <br /> 6.0. LIMITATIONS <br /> IOur professional services were performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by <br /> environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities The findings were based on <br /> analytical results provided by an independent laboratory Evaluations of the hydrogeologic <br /> conditions at the site for the purpose of this investigation are made from a Iimited number of <br /> available data points (i a soil and ground water samples) and subsurface conditions may vary away <br /> from these data points No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional <br /> interpretations, opinions and recommendations contained in this report j <br /> I <br /> 7.0. REFERENCES <br /> Maxey, G B , 1964, Hydrostratigraphic units Journal of Hydrology, v 2, pp 124-129 <br /> Robertson,P K , Campanella,R G , Gillespie, D and Greig, J , 1986,Use of piezometer cone data <br /> Proceedings of the ASCE Specialty Conference in Situ 86, Use of In Situ Tests in <br /> Geotechnical Engineering, Blacksburg, p 1263-1280 <br /> Sanders, L L , 1998, A manual of field hydrogeology Prentice-Hall, Inc , New Jersey, 381 p <br /> IAdvanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br /> I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.