My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010515
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
S
>
SUTTER
>
242
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545704
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0010515
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 11:08:07 AM
Creation date
5/28/2020 10:58:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0010515
RECORD_ID
PR0545704
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0009999
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UEX54/UE9AJ
STREET_NUMBER
242
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
SUTTER
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
Stockton
Zip
95202
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
242 N SUTTER ST
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1 <br />' 05 December 2002 <br /> AGE-NC Project No 02-0964 <br />' Page 4 of 7 <br />' 3.0. PROCEDURES <br /> On 28 October 2002,ground water monitoring and sampling were performed at each of the three on- <br /> site wells Field work was performed in accordance with guidelines established by the California <br /> Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) for investigation of underground storage tank <br /> (UST) sites <br />' 3 1 WELL MONITORING AND EVACUATION <br />' The depth to ground water was measured in each well from the top of the well casing to the nearest <br /> 0 01 foot utilizing a Solinst water level meter, the ground water elevation was calculated by <br /> subtracting the measured depth to ground water from the surveyed casing elevation (Table 1) <br /> I After water levels were measured approximately 6 gallons of ground water a minimum of three <br /> pP Y g <br /> casing water-volumes per well) were evacuated (purged) from the wells utilizing dedicated, <br /> polyethylene disposable bailers Temperature,pH and conductivity were measured for stabilization <br /> at regular purge-volume intervals using an Oakton water analyzer Field data and logs are provided <br /> h m Appendix B Purged groundwater was containerized in 55-gallon drums and was stored on-site, <br /> pending proper disposal <br /> I3 2 GROUND WATER SAMPLING <br />' Water samples were collected from each monitoring well using the dedicated,disposable bailers after <br /> allowing the wells to achieve a minimum 80%recovery of the pre-purge water volume The samples <br /> were transferred into three 40-m1 EPA-approved volatile organic analysis (VOA) vials containing <br /> I 0 5 ml 18% hydrochloric acid as a sample preservative and one-liter amber bottles lacking <br /> preservative Care was taken to ensure that visible air bubbles were not present in the vials after <br /> filling and capping The ground water sample containers were subsequently labeled with the well <br /> designation, date, time, and sampler's initials <br /> I33 LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF GROUND WATER SAMPLES <br /> Each ground water sample was logged on a chain-of-custody form,placed in a chilled container and <br /> shipped to Cal Tech Environmental Laboratories(CTEL)a California Department of Health Services <br /> (DHS)-certified analytical laboratory The samples were analyzed for <br /> • Total petroleum hydrocarbons quantified as gasoline and diesel (TPH-g and TPH-d) in <br /> accordance with EPA Method 8015 Modified and <br /> Advanced GeoEnvironmental,Inc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.