My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
WORK PLANS
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
U
>
UNION
>
425
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545776
>
WORK PLANS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2020 4:45:09 PM
Creation date
5/28/2020 4:38:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
WORK PLANS
RECORD_ID
PR0545776
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002231
FACILITY_NAME
JACK FROST ICE SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
425
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
UNION
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15112003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
425 N UNION ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
216
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that will facilitate site closure. Because benzene is the only aromatic that exceeds <br /> drinking water standards, it is the focus of this investigation. <br /> It is suspected that the source of the aromatics is the Tank #3 vicinity. This is <br /> indicated by soil samples containing aromatics (toluene) detected down to the water table <br /> in a boring advanced near Tank #3. However, the monitoring wells that have had <br /> detectable concentrations of aromatics are also located downgradient of Tanks #1 and <br /> #2, in addition to being adjacent to Tank #3. Previous sampling efforts in the Tank #1 <br /> and #2 area appear to be poorly documented, and there is the.possibility that <br /> soil samples were collected from too shallow of a depth to.detect whether a release had <br /> occurred from. these tanks. <br /> The Tank #4 vicinity is not considered a potential source of aromatics because <br /> { aromatics have not been detected in the water samples from wells in this vicinity (MW-3 <br /> and MW-5) nor have they been consistently detected in the soil samples collected in this <br /> vicinity following the soil excavation. <br /> 4.4 PROPOSED SCOPE OF WORK <br /> E <br /> A soil vapor investigation will be conducted to 1) investigate whether the Tank #1 <br /> I <br /> and #2 vicinity is a potential source area, and 2) to evaluate the lateral and vertical <br /> I <br /> extent of aromatics and TPH in' the vadose zone. A survey of production wells for j <br /> municipal, domestic, industrial, and other uses within 2,000 feet of the site is required for <br /> site closure (Tri-Regional Guidelines, Appendix B) and does not appear to have been <br />} <br /> performed to date. Such a survey is proposed in this work scope to facilitate site closure. <br /> In addition, it is proposed that a level survey be conducted to establish an accurate top- <br /> of-casing reference elevation for MW-4. F <br /> R4182OA-1222950-4 <br /> soilvap.pin 4 <br /> 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.