My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012763
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
U
>
UNION
>
425
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545776
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0012763
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 11:43:05 AM
Creation date
6/1/2020 11:40:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0012763
RECORD_ID
PR0545776
PE
3528
FACILITY_ID
FA0002231
FACILITY_NAME
JACK FROST ICE SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
425
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
UNION
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15112003
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
425 N UNION ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Union dee Company - Union Street Facility <br /> Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Repot, December, 1992 <br /> Page 2 <br /> r <br /> January 18 and 24, 1990. Of the six samples, four did not show any contaminants. <br /> However a sample from the north wall of the excavation (wN-3) had 285 mg/kg of oil <br /> and grease and a second, from the southern portion of the bottom of the excavation (FS_ <br /> 1) returned 200 mg/kg of oil and grease and 57 µg/kg of ethyl benzene. These two <br /> samples were a distance of twenty feet from the bottom of the tank where analysis of a <br /> sample (A5961) showed 12,000 mg/kg from beneath the.tank. <br />._ An estimate was made of the residual contamination 't this location based on the sampling <br /> of the tank excavation and attertuation.of contamination from the bottom of the tank to the <br /> w' limits of the excavation. <br /> From sample P85961 to sample FS-1, the oil and grease contaminant level dropped from <br /> 12,000 mg/kg to 200 mg/kg, or 590 mg/kg per foot: At this rate, the contaminant level <br />-- would fall to zero one half foot below the bottom of the excavation. However, for <br /> purposes of calculation, a more conservative approach was taken. It was assumed that the <br /> contamination extended over an area of ten by ten feet on the bottom of the excavation <br />`- and pinched out in the form of a wedge at a depth of thirty feet, five feet below the bottom <br /> of the excavation. The volume of contaminated soil would be: 1/2 X 10' X 10' X 5' X <br /> ,. 1/27 = 9.26 cubic yards. Since the contamination levels drop to zero at the zero line, the <br /> average contaminant levels would be approximately one half that of the maximum or 100 <br /> J mg/kg oil and grease and 28 gg/kg ethyl benzene. <br /> M Likewise, for the WN-3 sample area, it was assumed that the contamination extended over <br /> an area of six by six feet on the side of the excavation and pinched out in a wedge five fee- <br /> from it. This distance is halfway between the excavation and the monitoring well boring, <br /> MW-1. The volume of contaminated soil in this area would be 1/2 X 6'X 6'X 5'X 1/27= <br /> 3.33 cubic yards with a contaminant level of 142 mg/kg oil acid grease. <br /> Calculating a weighted average ..of the contamination in these two areas, the total <br /> estimated contaminated soil remaining on the margins of the tank #3 excavation is 12.6 <br /> cubic yards with a contaminant level o€111 mg/kg of oil and grease and 20 gg/kg of <br /> ethyl benzene. <br /> No estimate was made of the volume of soil contaminated by toluene reported from the <br /> MW-1 boring. This is because none of the soil samples on the bottom and sides of the <br /> tank #3 excavation had any detectable toluene_ Consequently, this contamination is <br /> presumed to be from another source. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.