Laserfiche WebLink
Mike Infurna <br /> From: Robert Hammond [rhammond@ameinc.net] <br /> Sent: Friday, March Ot, 2002 2:45 PM <br /> To: Mike Infurna <br /> Subject: Re: MW status at 75 W Valpico <br /> Mike: <br /> I can account for wells BC-6, BC-9, and BC-10: <br /> Well BC-6 is intact. Monitoring requirements were relaxed on BC-6 over the <br /> period 1989 to 1996, and I think the person preparing the well status report <br /> surmised it had been abandoned because BC-6 was not being actively sampled at <br /> that time. <br /> Wells BC-9 and BC-10 were accidentally covered up by a road scraper in 1995 and <br /> remained covered until 2000. The same road scraper damaged BC-11. Wells BC-9 <br /> and BC-10 were located and uncovered in July 2000 and are now regularly sounded <br /> and sampled. <br /> I have only partial confirmation that well BC-8 was abandoned - basically <br /> correspondence discussing the intent to abandon BC-8, and subsequent site maps <br /> with the symbol for BC-8 deleted. I will fax this to you for your records. <br /> Mike, these monitoring well status updates have been discussed in past <br /> monitoring reports. If you would like to be added to the semi-annual <br /> monitoring report distribution list, let me know. Currently the report goes to <br /> the Regional Board and the City of Tracy. <br /> Rob <br /> Mike Infurna wrote: <br /> > thanks for the Friday homework. . .just what I needed. <br /> > anyway, <br /> > I've been rifling thru our files for the data you requested. The 1991 stuff <br /> > is hard to read, follow and understand. <br /> > I can NOT verify the status of BC-1. No records of it's permitted <br /> > destruction and no notes in the chronology about it's destruction. .THe <br /> > burden of proof rests on you, or more precisely, the RP. <br /> > Same for BC-8. . .no notation or permit exists for it's destruction. <br /> > BC-11 properly destroyed on June 5, 2001 under EHD permit SR#0026358. <br /> > A CVRWQCB October 4, 1996 multi-paged letter raised a question concerning <br /> > BC-6 as being 'abandoned' ? and BC- 9 & 10 as "buried" . . . . .can you account <br /> > for these wells? <br /> > -----original Message----- <br /> • From: Robert Hammond [mailto:rhammond@ameinc.net] <br /> > Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 11:44 AM <br /> > TO: minfurna@phs.hs.co.san-joaquin.ca.us <br /> > Subject: MW status at 75 W Valpico <br /> > Mike: <br /> > Re: fmr Georgia-Pacific site, 75 W Valpico, Tracy, CA 95376 <br /> > As a result of a meeting with the Regional Board, we will be applying <br /> > for a permit to abandon site monitoring wells BC-1, BC-12, and RW-1, and <br /> > to install a new monitoring well. Regarding BC-1, this well is no <br /> > longer visible in the field, and there is a chance it has already been <br /> > abandoned. Do your records indicate anything on the status of BC-1? <br /> > Incidentally, past reports I have reviewed indicate two site wells have <br /> > previously been abandoned: <br /> 1 <br />