My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
page 1 of 2 <br /> Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> From: Dennis Leikam [dennisl@olives.com] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 9:13 AM <br /> To: Mike Infurna [EH] <br /> Subject: RE: application on Safeway <br /> Hi Mike, <br /> 1 - There are to be three wells total, "WC-2S and WC2-D" are next to each other at the location "Well <br /> Cluster 2" in the workplan (two boreholes, two wells - one shallow, one deep). The third well is the <br /> "Canal Influence" and I guess we can call it"MW-CI" (for monitoring well - canal influence). The MW-CI <br /> is only ONE well, that should make a total of three wells on Safeway property. I guess we're using <br /> overlapping terminology with the county row, but these are separate. In my mind, the county row stuff <br /> was not installed so all those "expired" and I was free to use the same terminology. Sorry about the <br /> confusion. <br /> 2 - I think we'd be starting these wells late next week, best case scenario, beginning with WC-21D. <br /> 3 - Current status of the PDW's is that we are working on PDW-3. We got to depth yesterday, today <br /> we're trying to figure out where to set the well and conductor casing. Frank will probably backfill some <br /> of the hole today and begin drilling with the 15" bit for the 8" conductor. I'll tell him to give you a status <br /> update today. These wells are slow going, so no news is kind of good news(for you). <br /> That help?? <br /> Thanks, <br /> Dennis <br /> From: Mike Infurna [EH] [mailto:MInfurna@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2008 9:28 AM <br /> To: Dennis Leikam <br /> Subject: application on Safeway <br /> Dennis, <br /> I started processing your recent application submittal for the wells ON Safeway property. Some questions... <br /> 1-applications lists"WC-2S"and "WC-2D", "canal influence", but then says 3 (THREE)wells in the comment <br /> section? How many you planning? I'll need the designation for the THIRD well please. Map shows"WELL PAIR <br /> #1"and "WELL PAIR#2......get me squared away on "pair#"and how it relates to Well name please. I thought <br /> WC's were to be in the County row but NOT done? move them on Safeway with same designation? <br /> 2-when are you thinking of starting these Safeway wells? <br /> 3- what's the status of PDW/any onsite Musco Family site wells now? any in progress? I haven't heard from <br /> you/V&W since Wed/May 21. update please. <br /> Michael J. Infurna Jr. <br /> Senior REHS. CA Reg#5649 <br /> LOP/Site Mitigation Unit IV <br /> 5/29/2008 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.