My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• - 11 _ <br /> STAFF REPORT <br /> ADMINISTRATIVE CIVIL LIABILITY ORDER AND <br /> REVISION TO THE CWC WATER CODE SECTION 13308 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER <br /> MUSCO OLIVE PRODUCTS AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> On 8 May 2002, an NOV was transmitted to the Discharger. The Discharger responded, acknowledging <br /> errors in the monitoring reports and indicating that a consultant will be contracted to perform the <br /> monitoring. <br /> Proposed Revision of TSO No. R5-2002-0014 <br /> The successful application of additional wastewater on the land application areas in the short term is <br /> dependant on several variables including: <br /> • Limiting the application to short duration events to maximize evaporation of wastewater, <br /> • Careful planning of the time of day the wastewater is applied, <br /> • Constant monitoring of the application to prevent ponding and the resultant odor generation, <br /> • Selection of crops that are tolerant of high moisture conditions, high TDS wastewater, and are able to <br /> be harvested and removed from the land application areas quickly. <br /> • Application of wastewater in a manner that won't cause offensive odors. <br /> After reviewing the information submitted and inspecting the site, staff recommend that the Regional <br /> Board allow the Discharger to increase its interim flow rate through a revision to TSO No. R5-2002- <br /> 0014. The recommendation is made because the Discharger has demonstrated that it has the hydraulic <br /> capacity to contain the wastewater, and requires the increased flow in order to remain a viable business <br /> operation. <br /> However, staff are also recommending several other revisions to the TSO, as described below. It is <br /> noted that CWC section 13308 states that if there is a continuing violation of, among other items, a C&A <br /> Order, then the Regional Board may establish a time schedule and a civil penalty which will become due <br /> if compliance is not achieved in accordance with the time schedule. Because the Discharger is in <br /> continuing violation of its C&A Order, it is appropriate to establish a time schedule and civil penalty for <br /> each of the revisions to this TSO. <br /> • The first revision to the TSO would allow the Discharger to increase its flow between the time <br /> period of 7 June and 7 September 2002. The 7-day average flow discharged to land may not <br /> exceed 820,000 gpd, while the daily maximum flow may not exceed 950,000 gpd. The 7-day <br /> averaging period shall be for a calendar week, from Monday through Sunday. The penalty for each <br /> weekly or daily violation would be $2,500 per day of violation. <br /> • The Discharger has allowed an offensive odor condition to exist. Staff have received numerous <br /> odor complaints regarding the odor and confirmed the odor condition on 10 May 2002. The <br /> Discharger needs to take additional steps to control odors; therefore, the TSO should be revised to <br /> require the Discharger to submit a report on the additional steps it has taken to control the <br /> offensive odors. The report would be due by 28 June 2002, and the penalty would be $5,000 for <br /> each day in which the report is late or incomplete. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.