My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
REVISED CWC SECTION 13308 TIME SCHEDULE ORDER NO.R5-2002-0014 • -2- <br /> MUSCO OLIVE PRODUCTS AND THE STUDLEY COMPANY <br /> SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY <br /> 9. The WDRs limit the wastewater flow to land to 500,000 gallons per day(gpd). However, a <br /> review of the self-monitoring reports from January 2001 through September 2001 shows that daily <br /> flow discharged to land ranges from 8,610 to 1,616,927 gpd, and that the permit limit was <br /> exceeded 47% of the time. <br /> 10. The January 2001 through September 2001 self-monitoring reports show that the total dissolved <br /> solids (TDS) concentrations in the wastewater ranged from approximately 2,500 to 5,600 mg/1. <br /> Dissolved Inorganic Solids (DIS) concentrations ranged from 800 to 3,700 mg/l, with an average <br /> concentration of 2,400 mg/1. These values exceed both the yearly average and daily maximum <br /> DIS loading limits contained in the WDRs. Sodium and chloride are also present at elevated <br /> concentrations in the wastewater. Sodium has been reported at average concentrations of <br /> approximately 864 mg/l; chloride has been reported at average concentrations of approximately <br /> 557 mg/l. <br /> 11. The Discharger's facility is on approximately 280 acres, of which approximately 200 acres are <br /> available for land application of process wastewater. Wastewater is currently spray irrigated to <br /> land containing mainly volunteer weeds and grass. The WDRs require that a crop be grown on the <br /> disposal land, but the Discharger did not begin planting a crop until 2001. In correspondence <br /> dated 15 January 2002, the Discharger reported that, since October 2001, approximately 50 acres <br /> of land has been planted to oats or winter wheat. Approximately 75 of the 200 acres are currently <br /> cropped. Because wastewater is applied to the land application areas at rates greater than can be <br /> used or disposed of by percolation and/or evapotranspiration, a significant amount of tailwater is <br /> generated. <br /> 12. The Discharger has stated that approximately 350 employees work on-site. Based on San Joaquin <br /> County Environmental Health Department (SJCEHD) records dated 25 October 2001, the facility <br /> is served by a septic tank that was sized for 164 employees. The records indicate the septic tank <br /> effluent discharges to eight, 95-feet long leach lines that are equipped with 25-feet deep seepage <br /> pits at the ends. The Discharger recently began applying industrial wastewater to the land over the <br /> leach lines. This will likely reduce the infiltration capacity of the soil and may impact the <br /> underlying groundwater quality. <br /> VIOLATIONS OF THE WASTE DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS <br /> 13. A 2 November 2001 inspection of the facility and land application areas, as well as a review of the <br /> case file, revealed numerous violations of the WDRs. On 30 November 2001 a Notice of <br /> Violation was transmitted to the Discharger. The violations of the WDRs are summarized below: <br /> a. WDRs Finding No. 5 limits the wastewater flow rate at 500,000 gallons per day. Bet,,nen <br /> January 2001 and September 2001, the Discharger has exceeded the flow rate 47% of the <br /> time. Additionally, the Discharger has failed to accurately monitor the flow rate using a <br /> meter. <br /> b. WDRs Findings No. 5, 7, and 17 limit the wastewater application to cropped areas. The <br /> Discharger has failed to plant crops on most of the land application areas. The small areas <br /> that have been cropped show severe plant tissue damage. <br /> c. WDRs Prohibition No. A.1 prohibits discharge of wastewater to surface water drainage <br /> courses. The Discharger has routinely used surface water drainage courses to convey <br /> wastewater. Two berms have been installed across the surface drainage to control tailwater <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.