My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VIA NICOLO
>
17950
>
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
>
PR0516772
>
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 12:44:39 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 12:23:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2900 - Site Mitigation Program
File Section
SITE INFORMATION AND CORRESPONDENCE
RECORD_ID
PR0516772
PE
2965
FACILITY_ID
FA0012793
FACILITY_NAME
MUSCO OLIVE LAND APP/TITLE 27
STREET_NUMBER
17950
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
VIA NICOLO
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95377
APN
20911032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
17950 W VIA NICOLO RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
893
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Monitoring Report Compliance Checklist 4 <br /> Discharges Regulated by Title 27 and/or Part 258 <br /> Reference Parameter Yes No N/A RWQCB <br /> Reviewer Comment <br /> t. Is there a map showing the area X <br /> and elevations in which filling has <br /> been completed during the past <br /> year and comparison to final <br /> closure contours? <br /> WDRs u. Is there a summary of the X Well MW-22 indicate increasing trends for <br /> Standard monitoring results indicating any sodium, chloride, and TDS. <br /> Provisions changes made or observed since <br /> (1993,1997,2000, the previous annual report? <br /> 2003) <br /> v. Is there an evaluation of the X Standard observations. No discussion <br /> effectiveness of the leachate concerning analytical results of Pond B sump <br /> monitoring/control facilities? liquid sampled and how those results <br /> compare to waste water disposed. <br /> Standard w. Is there a discussion about the X The LCRS system has never been tested <br /> Provisions annual LCRS testing and a during staff s tenure. This is a violation of <br /> (April 2000, comparison to earlier testing? Title 27. WDRs state that Discharger <br /> Sept. 2003)or proposes to test functionality of the LCRS <br /> check WDRs system. <br /> Violations Noted? (check one) Yes—X— No <br /> If No, check all issues that apply and provide comments: <br /> Comments (to be entered into CIWOS/Geotracker): <br /> Incomplete transmittal letter Evidence supports the need for the Discharger to . <br /> Incomplete report conduct a test of the LCRS and conduct a leak <br /> _ Inadequate monitoring program detection test of the liner. Lysimeter evaluation will <br /> New release continue and staff is concerned the lysimeters installed <br /> Inadequate response to evidence of a release in the underlying media do not provide adequate <br /> X WDRs violation other than listed above detection of a release. Well MW-22 could be <br /> Other (explain in comments) impacted by waste water. Piper diagram show Pond <br /> water plotting as sodium, potassium, chloride <br /> dominant water compared to MW-22 which also plots <br /> sodium, potassium, chloride dominant. Although <br /> concentrations differ dramatically, plots indicate a <br /> source of waste water is affecting groundwater. <br /> Conduct leak detection test to eliminate ponds as <br /> source. Well MW-12 is integral to DMP of ponds and <br /> should be considered for redevelopment or redrill to <br /> depth of 20R and 21 R. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.