My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008891
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
V
>
VAN BUREN
>
424
>
3500 - Local Oversight Program
>
PR0545786
>
ARCHIVED REPORTS_XR0008891
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/1/2020 2:37:00 PM
Creation date
6/1/2020 2:11:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
3500 - Local Oversight Program
File Section
ARCHIVED REPORTS
FileName_PostFix
XR0008891
RECORD_ID
PR0545786
PE
3526
FACILITY_ID
FA0004969
FACILITY_NAME
CHASE CHEVROLET
STREET_NUMBER
424
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
VAN BUREN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
424 N VAN BUREN ST
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
LSauers
Tags
EHD - Public
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
177
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7hN3dwell8RO110 <br /> All groundwater samples contained TPHg, ranging from 21,000 micrograms per liter (µg/1) in <br /> Boring 16B-11 to 240,000 µg/1 in boring 16B-8 BTEX compounds were detected in all <br /> samples, with benzene ranging from 700 �ig/l in boring 16B-11 to 10,000 µg11 in boring 16B-8 <br /> Table 2 summarizes the analytical results for groundwater <br /> 1 5 0 WELL DESTRUCTION <br /> During December 2003 Treadwell & Rollo submitted a well destruction workplan to the <br /> SJCEHD (Treadwell & Rollo 2003b), which was accepted on 12 January 2003 (SJCEHD <br /> 2003b) Between 1 March 2004 and 26 March 2004, all on-site wells were destroyed according <br /> to the procedures described in the workplan, except for sparging well SW-10 which could not <br /> be located <br /> Most of the wells were destroyed because they were un-used wells from previously abandoned <br /> air sparging, or water or soil vapor extraction systems Five of the monitoring wells had been <br /> installed prior to the regional rise in groundwater had top of screen intervals up to 5 feet below <br /> the water table, and therefore were not constructed properly given current conditions The <br /> remaining four monitoring wells and the ozone infections wells were destroyed because of the <br /> grading requirements and building locations of the proposed site redevelopment Table 1 <br /> identifies the destruction method used for each well The following is a summary of the <br /> wells destroyed <br /> • Twenty-two air sparging wells (SW-1 through SW-9 and SW-11 through SW-23) <br /> associated with a soil vapor extraction system that was abandoned in February 2001 <br /> G Five vapor extraction wells (VW1 through VW5) installed in the 1990s which were <br /> screened below the current groundwater table and not in use <br /> • Two groundwater extraction wells (EW3 and EW4) installed in the 1990s, which were <br /> never used <br /> • All 17 ozone sparging wells at the site <br /> 7 <br /> 25971014 DGD 7 April 2004 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.