Laserfiche WebLink
Timing or <br /> Person/ Frequency <br /> Monitoring Agency of <br /> Impact Mitigation Measure Requirements Responsible' Monitoring= <br /> 4.13-1(c) The recommended management and enhancement plan Review of plan by DFG; SP and O <br /> should seek to create agreements with the present and future DFG and SJCCDD. SJCCDD <br /> owners whereby a guaranteed minimal acreage of alfalfa <br /> would always be in production. This guarantee would be <br /> accomplished by designing a master decade-by-decade alfalfa <br /> rotation plan to which all farm owners and operators must <br /> adhere. It would also specify what crops would be beneficial <br /> to hawks during the normal one-year soil reconditioning <br /> period between alfalfa rotations. Other provisions of the <br /> agreements would focus on the vegetation of irrigation ditch <br /> banks and the dedication of small segments of land <br /> throughout the area to fallow plots on which natural <br /> vegetation could develop. <br /> 4.13-1(d) The management and enhancement plan should clearly state Establish monitoring SJCCDD: SP; O; yearly <br /> -- that rodenticides should be strictly prohibited along with the program for review by DFG for first five <br /> use of any wildlife "scare guns." Fire crackers and hunting DFG yearly for five years and <br /> ' should not be allowed. "Ihe final element of the years and once per then every <br /> recommended management and enhancement plan should he three or five years. three or five <br /> a monitoring program that would provide an annual written On-site verification. years. <br /> review submitted to the DFG for the first five years and <br /> thereafter every three to five years. <br /> 4.13-1(e) To confirm the presence of the San Joaquin kit fox. DFG review and DFG SP <br /> additional surveys should be undertaken during the first half approval of survey <br /> of 1992 when the kit fox pups are active outside of the den. design. <br /> This survey should be conducted prior to approval of the implementation. and <br /> Specific Plan. Results of the survey may conclude that findings. <br /> on- or off-site mitigation would be required. If off-site <br /> mitigation Is recommended, the land use map would <br /> not change. However, acquisition for off-site habitat <br /> should occur prior to adoption of the Specific Plan. If <br /> on-site mitigation is required, a General Plan <br /> amendment must be adopted prior to adopting the <br /> Specific Plan. <br /> 'SJCCDD:San Joaquin County Community Development Deparlment: SJCBD:San Joaquin County Building Division;SJCDPW San.loaquin C'ounly Department of Public Works;USAC'F: U.S.Array Corps <br /> of Engineers; SICFCE: San Joaquin County Flood Control Engincer: CSD:Community Services District(of project); RWQCB: Regional Water Quality Control hoard;CDFG: California Department of Fish <br /> and Ganmc:SJCEHD:San Joaquin County Environmental I lealth Deparlment:DIIS:California Department of Flealth Services;IAFCO:Local Agency Formation Commission. Those responsible would maintain <br /> monitoring records and verify compliance with mitigation measure. <br /> GPA: General Plan Amendment stage: SP: Specific Plan stage: PC Pre-conslruclion stage: (includes Tentative Map approval o;:and Final Map approvals and other discretionary application <br /> approvals): r- Construction stage (prior to building permit issuance): O: Operational stage. <br />