My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
SU0013380
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
P
>
PATTERSON PASS
>
0
>
2600 - Land Use Program
>
GP-89-11
>
SU0013380
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/2/2020 4:22:18 PM
Creation date
6/2/2020 4:07:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2600 - Land Use Program
RECORD_ID
SU0013380
PE
2600
FACILITY_NAME
GP-89-11
STREET_NUMBER
0
STREET_NAME
PATTERSON PASS
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376-
APN
20904003
ENTERED_DATE
5/29/2020 12:00:00 AM
SITE_LOCATION
PATTERSON PASS RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\gmartinez
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
373
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT C <br /> FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANT UNAVOIDABLE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT <br /> IDENTIFIED IN THE MOUNTAIN HOUSE <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT <br /> Section 15091(a) of the 'State CEQA Guidelines' states: <br /> (a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been completed which <br /> identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project unless the public agency <br /> makes one or more written findings for each of those significant effects, accompanied by a brief <br /> explanation of the rationale for each finding. The possible findings are: <br /> (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which <br /> avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Final <br /> EIR. <br /> (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public <br /> agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by <br /> such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency. <br /> (3) Specific economic,social,or other consierations make infeasible any mitigation measures <br /> or project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> 1. Impact: <br /> Development of the proposed project would result in the loss of approximately 3600 acres of <br /> Prime Farmland and would require cancellation of 2920 acres currently under Williamson Act <br /> Contract. <br /> Mitigation: <br /> None that can reduce the impact to less than significant. <br /> Finding: <br /> Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible any mitigation measures or <br /> project alternatives identified in the Final EIR. <br /> Supporting Facts: <br /> To approve any GPA to permit a new town in San Joaquin County would require the removal of <br /> a significant acreage of land in some type of agricultural use. If the County decision makers <br /> determine that new towns are a desirable land use development tool, then it is inevitable that the <br /> conversion of significant amounts of agricultural land will occur. The challenge is to locate the <br /> new town to minimize the loss of prime farmland while still meeting the rest of the locational and <br /> development requirements specified in the New Town Policies of the General Plan. Thus, while <br /> significant amounts of prime farmland will be converted to urban uses, it has been minimized by <br /> the effective incorporation of the remaining new town policies which will insure that the land <br /> converted is developed in an efficient urban pattern which maximizes the land's development <br /> Attachment C C-1 (PC: 4-9-92) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.