SU0013380 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

........ .: ::;»::>::>::> :: .11 EXCERPT FROM TABLE 7.1 :::::::::..::::::::::::.::::::.::::::::::,:.;>;.;:.;:.;;;:;.;;•.:...............;::::>:%'>::> ::>::::> R OR MITIGATION MONITOR PRO W1M. :::::::;.;:::;.;:.:;;.;:.;::.;::::: :.;:.;:.;:.;:::.::.:::.::::::.:::::::::.::::::.::.::::.:::::::.::.:::.;:.;:.;....... :,, SUMMARY TABLE F MtT TI N MfTfGATiON MEASURES REQUIRED ATTH� Timing or Monitoring Person/Agency Frequency of Impact Mitigation Measure Requirements Responsible Monitoring 4.14-1: The Proposed Project Scenario would 4.14-1 : The overall size of the project could he downscaled Review at OPA stage. SJCCDD OPA generate up to 249,000 daily vehicle trips to,from, to reduce traffic generation of the project and associated or within the project she In 2010 assuming current adverse Impacts on the transportation system. It should be rates of trip making. The Market Constraint noted,however,that reducing the size of the project would Scenario would generate up to 177,000 dally not mitigate all Identified adverse Impacts of the project since, vehicle trips to,from, or within the project she In on many regional facilities,cumulative trefflc levels without 2010. With either project scenario,the added trips the project (as Indicated for the No Project Scenario) are would contribute significantly to projected traffic projected to exceed capacities. growth, Increases In vehicle miles traveled, and LOS deficiencies on the road system, particularly In the vicinity of the she. Some of these Impacts would be unavoidable and significant. Specific facilities and locations of these Impacts are described In subsequent Impacts. AIR QUALITY` 4.15.2: The project would Increase the potential 4.15-2(a): Prior to adoption of the General Plan Amendment, Review at OPA stage. SJCCDD GPA for air quality and odor-related land use conflicts. buffer zones between existing agricultural lands and residences should be provided. The size of the buffer zone should be determined by the type of agricultural activities irrvotved,with a larger buffer required where the agricultural activities require frequent tilling,waste burning, or pesticide application. A minimum of 1,000 feet is recommended (see Alternative 5.5). The buffer zone could consist of a mixture of open space, compatible land uses (such as water treatment plant,some commercial uses, some clean Industrial uses), recreational uses, landscaped areas, streets,or other nonintenslve uses. Mitigation Measures -5- ER-91-1/GP-89-11