My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1 2003-2006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
EMBARCADERO
>
6651
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0522357
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_FILE 1 2003-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2020 5:27:37 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:14:27 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
FILE 1 2003-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0522357
PE
2220
FACILITY_ID
FA0014885
FACILITY_NAME
MARINA WEST MARINE SERVICE
STREET_NUMBER
6651
STREET_NAME
EMBARCADERO
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95219
APN
09814007
CURRENT_STATUS
02
SITE_LOCATION
6651 EMBARCADERO DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\HW\HW_2220_PR0522357_6651 EMBARCADERO_FILE 1 2003-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4.2 Post-Excavation Soil Sampling <br /> Following the completion of excavation, confirmation soil samples were collected from the floor <br /> of the excavation. At the request of DTSC, additional delineation samples were also collected <br /> east of the excavated area and one additional delineation sample was collected from the face of <br /> the levee. Sampling locations are shown on Figure 3. In keeping with the previous work, the <br /> samples were identified by X & Y coordinates: X = distance in feet east or west (E or W) of the <br /> zero point marked on the ground, and Y = distance in feet south (S) of the asphalt pavement. <br /> Confirmation samples are indicated by the letter "C" in the first part of the identification and by <br /> 1 "SURF" at the end. These were collected from the floor of the excavated area, or approximately <br /> 3 inches beneath the original ground surface. The additional delineation samples were collected <br /> from the current ground surface. <br /> ' The soil samples were collected in clean brass tubes sealed with teflon sheets and plastic end <br /> P � - <br /> caps. Each sample was identified with the sample ID, date and time collected, collector's initials <br /> and requested analysis. The sample tubes were placed in individual sealed plastic bags and stored <br /> on ice in an insulated container for transport to the laboratory. Sampling equipment was cleaned <br /> between samples in order to minimize the possibility of cross contamination. <br /> All soil samples were submitted under chain of custody protocol to State-certified GeoAnalytical <br /> Laboratories, Inc. in Modesto, California. Per the DTSC workplan approval memorandum, the <br /> analysis consisted of total copper by EPA Method 6010B for all samples with the addition of total <br /> lead and total chromium by EPA Method 6010B and hexavalent chromium by EPA Method <br /> 7196A for three selected samples. After reviewing the results and consulting with DTSC, <br /> additional analysis was performed. Samples 0/3S, 151E/3S and 166E/3S were analyzed for <br /> soluble copper by DI-WET extraction and EPA 6010B analysis. Sample 0/3S was also analyzed <br /> ' for soluble copper and soluble lead by citric acid-WET (STLC) extraction and EPA 6010B <br /> analysis. <br /> ' 4.3 Analytical Results <br /> The analytical results for all post-excavation soil samples are summarized in Table 2. Laboratory <br /> reports and chain of custody documention are included in Appendix D. <br /> Total Metal Concentrations <br /> The minimum, maximum and 95% upper confidence level (UCL) metal concentrations in ppm <br /> are presented below. Non-detect values (hexavalent chromium only) were treated as positive <br /> results at the detection limit concentration but statistics were not calculated. Note that due to the <br /> ' small number of samples, the UCL concentrations for lead and chromium are higher than the <br /> maximum values detected. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.