Laserfiche WebLink
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM <br />Evaluation of Bed Ash Disposal <br />Forward Landfill <br />San Joaquin, California <br />November 1, 2016 <br />Page 6 <br />over time. Therefore, as described in more detail below, leakage through this system (if <br />it were to occur) would be very low; and <br />• The Forward Landfill is underlain by lenticular deposits of clay, silt and sand with minor <br />gravel of the Pleistocene Victor Formation and the first encountered groundwater occurs <br />about 60 to 80 feet below the native ground surface. The generally fine-grained nature <br />of the subsurface soils suggests that if leakage were to occur, the time required for the <br />leachate to reach groundwater would be very long and any copper remaining in solution <br />would likely adsorb to the subsurface silt and clay. <br />The qualitative conclusion that bed ash disposal is unlikely to affect groundwater was further <br />evaluated by calculating containment system leakage rates and then using a transient/steady- <br />state model to calculate maximum copper concentrations in groundwater at the closest <br />downgradient monitoring well to each of the disposal areas shown in Figure 1. The results of <br />these evaluations are summarized below. <br />Containment System and Leakage Rate <br />All the bed ash disposal locations shown in Figure 1 are underlain by a Subtitle D composite liner <br />system that includes (from top to bottom): (i) a LCRS; (ii) a 60 -mil high density polyethylene <br />[HDPE] liner; and (iii) a 2 -foot -thick compacted clay liner [CCL] with a maximum hydraulic <br />conductivity of 1E-7 centimeters per second (cm/sec). Because an intact geomembrane has <br />extremely low permeability, if leakage occurs, most of the liquid migration occurs through <br />geomembrane defects. In general, if there is a defect in the geomembrane, liquid passes first <br />through the defect, then it flows laterally some distance between the geomembrane and CCL <br />before ultimately infiltrating into and through the CCL. Other factors being equal, higher leakage <br />will occur if there is poor contact between the geomembrane and the underlying clay. <br />Giroud (1997) proposed a series of equations to calculate the rate of liquid migration through <br />composite liners that accounts for these migration mechanisms and is based on the head of liquid <br />on the top of the liner, the number, size, and geometry of defects, the quality of the contact <br />between the geomembrane and underlying CCL, and the thickness and hydraulic conductivity of <br />the CCL. For the purposes of this analysis, circular defects were assumed and the leakage rate <br />