My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
A
>
AUSTIN
>
9999
>
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
>
PR0505948
>
COMPLIANCE INFO
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/9/2020 2:01:51 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:20:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2200 - Hazardous Waste Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
RECORD_ID
PR0505948
PE
2227
FACILITY_ID
FA0007101
FACILITY_NAME
FORWARD INC LANDFILL
STREET_NUMBER
9999
Direction
S
STREET_NAME
AUSTIN
STREET_TYPE
RD
City
MANTECA
Zip
95336
APN
20106003
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
9999 S AUSTIN RD
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\HW\HW_2227_PR0505948_9999 S AUSTIN_.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
522
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
0 0 <br /> TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM <br /> Evaluation of Bed Ash Disposal <br /> Forward Landfill <br /> San Joaquin, California <br /> November 1, 2016 <br /> Page 4 <br /> Figure 1 (these disposal areas total about 45 acres). Although uniform distribution is judged to <br /> be unlikely and it is possible that thicker layers are present, it is doubtful that the locations of <br /> pockets of bed ash at different depths within the total 45-acre disposal area could be identified <br /> by drilling, geophysical, excavation, or other means. Therefore, selective excavation of the bed <br /> ash is not feasible. <br /> Because selective excavation is not feasible, virtually all the 1.68 million tons of co-disposed <br /> refuse could require excavation to remove the 2,431 tons of bed ash.2 Excavation, <br /> transportation, and off-site disposal of this quantity of material may reasonably be assumed to <br /> be infeasible based on costs and potential environmental impacts. For example: <br /> • Data from three partial to complete non-hazardous waste landfill clean closures in <br /> California indicated costs that ranged from$21/cubic yard(yd 3)to$57/yd3 for excavation, <br /> transportation, off-site disposal, engineering, and monitoring. Although actual costs <br /> would be very site-specific and a cost estimate has not been developed for the Forward <br /> Landfill, the information indicates removing 1.68 million tons of waste from the landfill <br /> and disposing it offsite at a Class I landfill would be on the order of tens of millions of <br /> dollars or more; <br /> • Offsite disposal of 1.68 million tons of waste could require on the order of 67,000 <br /> truckloads and more than 21 million roundtrip vehicle miles assuming a hauling capacity <br /> of 25 tons per truck and disposal at the Kettleman Hills Landfill (the closest Class I landfill <br /> to Forward Landfill); <br /> • Refuse excavation of this magnitude in an active solid waste facility would likely require <br /> portions of the landfill gas system to be removed from service during the work. This <br /> would increase the potential for subsurface gas migration,would require a large quantity <br /> of water to manage dust and odors, and would increase air emissions and odors <br /> associated with landfill operations; and <br /> • Open excavations would appreciably increase the potential for subsurface fires by <br /> allowing oxygen access to the waste mass. <br /> z Depending on depths of burial,the total amount of excavation could exceed 1.7 million tons due to <br /> excavation slope requirements. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.