Laserfiche WebLink
Pagel of 2 <br /> to <br /> Garrett Backus [EH] <br /> From: Network Administrator[PHS] <br /> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 9:59 AM <br /> To: Garrett Backus [EH] <br /> Subject: FW: gbackus@sjcehd.com -RE: Blaster Dust analysis-Sender is probably forged (SPF <br /> Softfail) <br /> Attachments: 20100330160703878.pdf <br /> ATTENTION: This message has been forwarded by the Network Administrator because it was accidentally <br /> caught in the spam filter. It will be reviewed and the system will be re-tuned in an attempt to prevent future <br /> recurrences. Please direct any replies to the original sender. <br /> Thank you, <br /> The Network Administrator <br /> From: Juano, Derric [mailto:derricj@herricksteel.com] <br /> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 5:15 PM <br /> To: Garrett Backus [EH] <br /> Subject: gbackus@sjcehd.com - RE: Blaster Dust analysis - Sender is probably forged (SPF Softfail) <br /> Garrett, <br /> Attached is a letter from FGL stating where the testing on the"Blaster dust'was done. I will call sometime in the <br /> morning tomorrow to discuss any further testing if needed and/or disposal alternatives if possible. <br /> Thanks <br /> Derric Juano <br /> From: Garrett Backus [EH] [mailto:gbackus@sjcehd.com] <br /> Sent: Monday, March 15, 2010 12:10 PM <br /> To: Juano, Derric <br /> Subject: Blaster Dust analysis <br /> Hi Derric, <br /> I reviewed the analysis done by FGL Environmental and have the following comments: <br /> 1. The FGL Environmental Stockton laboratory does not have ELAP certification to do hazardous waste analysis <br /> according to online certification information at http://www,cdph.ca.gov/certlic/labs/ LAP.asPages/E . They are <br /> certified to do wastewater and drinking water. Therefore, these results cannot be accepted by the Environmental <br /> Health Dept. <br /> 2. To show that the blaster dust is nonhazardous waste, testing must be done by an ELAP certified lab with <br /> hazardous waste certification. In addition, further testing must be done beyond the TTLC(mg/kg)testing. <br /> 3. The TTLC(mg/kg)analysis shows that the Chromium, Copper and Nickel levels are high enough to require <br /> STLC testing. The Selenium result was ND but the detection limit was 25 mg/kg which is well above the STLC <br /> limit of 1.0 mg/I. Selenium will also require STLC testing or TTLC testing with a lower detection limit. <br /> 3/31/2010 <br />