Laserfiche WebLink
FORM IC <br />Sec. VI - Generator Status EPA ID NO. rIP' IDI 10 1 6 1 3 [13L6EJ7 _L6 J <br />A. 1991 RCRA generator status <br />B. Reason for not generating <br />Instruction page 7 <br />Page 9 <br />(CHECK ONE BOX BELOW) <br />(CHECK ALL THAT APPLY) <br />5a 1 LOG0 <br />0 —1 <br />1 Never generated <br />0 4 Only non-hazardouswaste <br />2 SOG (SKIP TO SEC. VII) <br />0 <br />0 2 Out of business <br />0 5 Periodic or occasional generator <br />3 CESOG <br />0 <br />0 3 Only excluded or delisted <br />0 6 Waste minimization activity <br />4 Non generator (CONTINUE TO BOX 8) <br />waste <br />0 7 Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) <br />Sec. V11 - On -Site Waste Management Status <br />A. RCRA permitted or interim status storage <br />B. RCRA permitted or interim status <br />C. RCRA-exempt treatment, disposal, or recycling <br />Instruction page 10 <br />treatment, disposal, or recycling <br />Page 11 <br />Page 10 <br />LJ <br />i L I <br />Sec. Vill - Waste Minimization Activity during 190 or 1991 <br />A Did this site begin or expand a IgU= <br />B. Did this site begin or expand a <br />C. Did this site systematically investigate opportunities <br />mAudgn activity during W or 1'909 <br />Lwamli= activity durinX=or <br />for during XMor 1AM <br />Instruction page 11 1988 1989 <br />Page 12 1988 1989f§W. <br />Page 12 1988 1989 <br />0 1 Yes <br />0 1 Yes <br />0 1 Yes <br />0 2 No <br />0 2 No <br />0 2 No <br />D. Did any of the factors listed below delay or limit this site's ability to initiate now or additional jgUEgLMdyjCg= activities in or T= <br />Page 12 <br />1988 1989 <br />(CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) <br />Yes- NA <br />PF 0 <br />2 a. Insufficient capital to install now source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction practices <br />01 0 2 b. Lack of technical information on source reduction techniques applicable to the specific production processes <br />01 (0 2 c. Source reduction is not economically feasible: cost savings in waste management or production will not recover <br />the capital investment <br />01 1Z 2 d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction <br />01 2 9. Technical limitations of the production processes <br />Eli 2 f. Permitting burdens <br />C31 2 g. Source reduction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be technically feasible <br />C31 [9 2 - h. Source reduction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be economically feasible <br />01 2 1. Source reduction previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear to be feasible due to permitting requirements <br />[31 2 j. Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) <br />E. Did any of the factors listed below delay or limit this site's ability to initiate new or additional on-site or off-site joDygUM activities during 1990 or 1991? <br />Page 12 <br />(CHECK YES OR NO FOR EACH ITEM) <br />YAL NQ Y61 NQ <br />gi C3 2 a. Insufficient capital to install now recycling equipment [31 k] 2 h. <br />Technical limitations of production processes inhibit <br />or implement now recycling practice <br />5a1 1:1 <br />on-site recycling <br />2 b. Lack of technical information on recycling techniques 01 KJ 2 1. <br />Permitting burdens inhibit recycling <br />applicable to this site's specific production processes 01 4-12 j. <br />Lack of permitted off-site recycling facilities <br />2 c. Recycling is not economically feasible: cost savings ngs in [31 2 k. <br />Unable to identify a market for recyclable materials <br />waste management or production will not recover the C]l X] 2 I. <br />Recycling previously implemented - additional <br />capital investment recycling does not appear to be technically feasible <br />C31 IR 2 d. Concern that product quality may decline as a result El 1 2 m. Recycling previously implemented - additional <br />of recycling <br />131 13 2 a. Requirements to manifest wastes inhibit shipments off [31] 2 n. <br />recycling does not appear to be economically feasible <br />Recycling previously implemented - additional <br />site for recycling <br />Ell 121 f. Financial <br />recycling does not appear to be feasible due to <br />2 liability provisions inhibit shipments off site for <br />permitting requirements <br />recycling 01 2 o. <br />131 [a <br />Other (SPECIFY COMMENTS IN BOX BELOW) <br />2 g. Technical limitations of production processes inhibit <br />shipments off site for recycling <br />Comments: <br />Page 2 of ,$_ <br />