My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2015
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
B
>
BENJAMIN HOLT
>
2908
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231021
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2011-2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/22/2022 2:32:40 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:44:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2011-2015
RECORD_ID
PR0231021
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003625
FACILITY_NAME
ARCO STATION #83560*
STREET_NUMBER
2908
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
BENJAMIN HOLT
STREET_TYPE
DR
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95207
APN
09763032
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
2908 W BENJAMIN HOLT DR
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
002
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231021_2908 W BENJAMIN HOLT_2011-2015.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
394
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
a <br /> REGEIVEL) <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> 2015 <br /> Software Version Installed: 332.00 <br /> Complete the following checklist: NTAL. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? m.rr° =w•��- page f T <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their proper <br /> operation? <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.,modem)operational? <br /> ® N/A <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, <br /> ❑ N/A fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sumplrrench <br /> Sensors; ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes; ❑No. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e., no mechanical overfill prevention valve is <br /> ❑ N/A installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s)and operating properly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity <br /> does the alarm trigger? 90% <br /> ❑ Yes ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name <br /> and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ®Yes* ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑Product; ❑Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> "In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: CLEANED WATER OUT OF PROBE SUMP . INSPECTOR ON SITE <br /> Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.