Laserfiche WebLink
Funding Policies <br /> 1. General Fund costs associated with tank removal should be minimized.The use of State, <br /> federal, and grant or other non—general fund funding sources should be maximized. <br /> 2. To fund removal of tanks, other than those associated with new construction,two funding <br /> approaches are planned: <br /> A. Net proceeds from the Hotel Stockton sale are planned to be earmarked for tank <br /> removal work. <br /> B.Annually,commencing in 1993-94, a specific amount will be appropriated up to <br /> $200,000 in the public improvement budget for underground tank removal efforts. <br /> 3. Viewing some tank removal costs as a latent, previously uncharged cost of operating the <br /> motor pool, during 1992-93 the County Administrator's Office and Public Works will <br /> study how motor pool rates can be structured to accumulate funds for tank removal. If fea- <br /> sible,such an allowance will be built into motor pool rates for 1993-94. (Such an <br /> approach meets the previous policy of minimizing General Funds costs since motor pool <br /> mileage rates are reimbursable under State and Federal reimbursement programs.) <br /> DB06-07 <br />