My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2006
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAZELTON
>
1810
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231141
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1998-2006
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2024 3:02:37 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:45:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1998-2006
RECORD_ID
PR0231141
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003954
FACILITY_NAME
SJ CO PUBLIC WORKS CORP YARD*
STREET_NUMBER
1810
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
HAZELTON
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95205
APN
15518002
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1810 E HAZELTON AVE
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231141_1810 E HAZELTON_1998-2006.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
445
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
II 1 rl r l-QQF\ <br />D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br />Software Version Installed: <br />C rimnirtr the fnitnwina eh►eWact- <br />r- H(Xt 6 ) <br />k3'Yes ❑ No" <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />es ® No* <br />Is the visual alarm o erational? <br />Yes O No' <br />Were all sensors visually inspected,functional) • tested,and confirmed o erational? <br />Yes D No* <br />Were ail sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br />not interfere with their % ei o eration? <br />0 Yes 0 No• <br />If alarms art relayrd to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equiprzunt (c.g. modem) <br />q N/A <br />operational? <br />1,ej, Yrs '❑ No• <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the Rtrbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br />k Q N/A <br />monitonng system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensor} initiate <br />positive shut -down? (Check all that apply) ,la tump/Trench Sensors; .Dispenser Containment Sensors <br />r <br />Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks W sensor failure/discoanection?sd Yes; 0 No, <br />❑ Yes ❑ No* <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br />¢YN/A <br />mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br />fill 2oint(s) and operatistg properly_? If so, at what percent of tank ca aci tZ does the alarm tri7 _ger? <br />j Yes• :;a' No <br />Was any monitoring equipawnt replaced? If ye:,, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced <br />and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below, <br />Z Yes' 0 No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that appl)) ❑ <br />Product; ZNVater. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. <br />Yes 0 No; <br />Was moaitoEjRj s tem set-up reviewed to ensure 2roper setting? Attach set up reports, if a lica�le <br />Yes 0 No• <br />Is al! monitorin c ui menta erational ger manufacturer's specifications? <br />In Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br />E. Comments: <br />L <br />Page 7 of 3 03101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.