My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
401
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231346
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2023 4:05:16 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:47:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231346
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003603
FACILITY_NAME
TESORO (SPEEDWAY XP) 68152
STREET_NUMBER
401
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04513019
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
401 W KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231346_401 W KETTLEMAN_2013-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
620
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• r I <br /> Monitoring System Certification-Page 2 of 3 <br /> Site Address: 401 W. Kettleman Ln. Date of Testing/Servicing: 2123/18 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed- 122.00 <br /> Complete the follo ing checklist: <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* I Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> W Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> X Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station,is all communications equipment(e.g.modem) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ® Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems,does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected? If yes:which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? to Yes ❑ No <br /> ❑ Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e.no <br /> IN N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating ro erly? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? 0 % <br /> ❑ Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> ❑ Yes* go No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ❑ Product;❑ Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> IN Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? (Attach set-up reports, if a licahle. <br /> L.�Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: E-Stops-Tested&Passed <br /> The Sump sensors did not have Positive Shutdown upon arrival.Alternate Electrical contractor <br /> arrived on site to make repairs and the Sump Sensors were then Tested and Passed. <br /> i <br /> I <br /> ii <br /> s <br /> : <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.