My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-1998
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
K
>
KETTLEMAN
>
601
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231348
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1997-1998
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/15/2023 9:44:21 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:47:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1997-1998
RECORD_ID
PR0231348
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003803
FACILITY_NAME
KETTLEMAN CHEVRON
STREET_NUMBER
601
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
KETTLEMAN
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
LODI
Zip
95240
APN
04728006
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
601 E KETTLEMAN LN
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231348_601 E KETTLEMAN_1997-1998.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
575
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'MY-09-1997 11:51 FE PETRO INC 608 838 7840 P.09 <br /> v w en closed with the leak still present in the line. <br /> 6) The pressure LI vale as then <br /> For a non-leak situation, the bleed valve was closed when the pressure reached <br /> zero. <br /> 7) With the dispenser nozzle in the closed position, the pump was turned on. If the <br /> line pressure rose to full pump pressure (usually 28 to 30 psi) a non-lealdng line <br /> was indicated. <br /> 8) Since the test times were very short, the testing sequence was repeated at least <br /> three times for each circulation period by repressurizing the line (without <br /> additional circulation) and repeating steps 5 through 7. <br /> Only four types of results were possible.- First, a leaking line is found to be 1 (a <br /> correct conclusion). Second, a non-leaking line is found to be tight (a correction conclusion). <br /> Third, a leaking line is found to be tight (a missed detection) and fourth, a tight line is reported <br /> to be leaking(a false alarm). The results of each test were recorded and compared to the correct <br /> conclusion. <br /> Test Results Summary <br /> The results of the testing have been reported using the Performance Evaluation forms <br /> provided in the EPA protocol which certify the test results. These have been reproduced in <br /> Appendix A. The data,test conditions, and other technical information is summarized in several <br /> attachments to the Performance Evaluation, which are provided in Appendix B. Table I. <br /> summarizes the test requirements for various temperature conditions. Table 2 summarizes the <br /> testing which was conducted for the evaluation arranged from lowest temperature to highest, An <br /> effort—was made to maintain the flow at 3.0 gal/hr for each test run, but due to the difficulty in <br /> maintaining uniform flow through an orifice under operating conditions, some of the rates vary <br /> slightly. <br /> A total of 55 tests were conducted using the EPA evaluation protocol. These were <br /> divided into 26 leak tests, 25 no-leak tests, and 3 vapor tests. No valid failures were recorded <br /> during the evaluation. The leaks tabulated were detected and no false alarms occurred with the <br /> "zero leaks". Since the time period for data collection is very short for the STP-MLD (less than <br /> 5 minutes were required) up to three tests could be conducted for each temperature condition as <br /> discussed in Section 5.2 of the protocol. <br /> 3 <br /> TOTAL P.09 ____ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.