My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2008
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
T
>
TRACY
>
3725
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231417
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2024 12:52:19 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:48:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006-2008
RECORD_ID
PR0231417
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003780
FACILITY_NAME
TRACY SHELL*
STREET_NUMBER
3725
Direction
N
STREET_NAME
TRACY
STREET_TYPE
BLVD
City
TRACY
Zip
95376
APN
21217030
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3725 N TRACY BLVD
P_LOCATION
03
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231417_3725 N TRACY_2006-2008.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
421
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9 0 Page 3 of 5 <br />RE: Shell '373GTracy Bd'Tracy -1]6188 <br />I actually didn't get an attachment of your inspection report with your e-mail <br />below, but | |000hod one in Shell's files. | guess |'m a little confused though as it <br />states that the sensor was tobechanged out immediately, but through a <br />permit. Per the inspection report I assumed that you wanted the permit issued <br />prior to installing the sensor. If that is the case, and the permit has just been <br />faxed hoMarty, then we're beyond 30days already. <br />Should we have changed out the sensor while waiting for apermit, or once we <br />submit the permit application do we have permission to change out the sensor? <br />Just looking for asuggestion anhow bonot exceed the 30day requirement <br />while awaiting a permit. <br />| thought | had seen enadvisory from the SVVRCBasking that agencies allow <br />replacement of defective monitoring equipment immediately while permits were <br />being applied for aomaybe that was what you thought had happened. <br />Can you please let meknow how | can improve our process. <br />Thanks <br />Debbie Wafts <br />Service Station Systems,|no. <br />88OQuinn Ave <br />San Jose, CA 95112 <br />4O8'S38'7113'Direct Line <br />4O8 -213 -8O13 - Direct Fax <br />4O8 -Q71 -2445 -Office <br />From: Michelle Henry [EH] [maUto:.com] <br />Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 3:30prn <br />To: Debbie Watts; Steve A.8kmndenson <br />Cc: Gina L. Pinnentd <br />Subject: RE: Shell - 3725 Tracy Bd, Tracy - 136186 <br />According honlyinspection report and ifmemory serves meright only the 87 <br />STP sump sensor failed during the MC. <br />| just want to darify, it seems in your first email that you are under the <br />impression a permit is required due to the fact you are changing all sensors and <br />just not the failed one, which is incorrect. A permit would still be required even <br />ifyou were only changing 1sensor. The permit has been approved and faxed <br />tnMarty VVeithmanbochange all 4STP sensors. | believe the 3Udays you are <br />referring to is to actually submit the Return to Compliance Certification with <br />documentation supporting how each violation has been corrected. Austated in <br />myoriginal inspection report the sensor needed bnbnchanged immediately <br />under permit through this office, not 3Odays. Unfortunately | can not grant on <br />extension tnsubmit the Return toCompliance certification. These documents <br />4/l6/2UO@ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.