My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2005
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
M
>
MAIN
>
341
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231477
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1996-2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/9/2024 4:42:40 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:50:03 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1996-2005
RECORD_ID
PR0231477
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003753
FACILITY_NAME
RIPON SHELL*
STREET_NUMBER
341
Direction
E
STREET_NAME
MAIN
STREET_TYPE
ST
City
RIPON
Zip
95366
APN
26114007
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
341 E MAIN ST
P_LOCATION
05
P_DISTRICT
005
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231477_341 E MAIN_1996-2005.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
309
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NMonitoring System Certification-Pu of 3 40 <br /> Site Address: 341 E. Main St. @ Hwy. 99 Date of Testing/Servicing: 03127/02 <br /> D. Results of Testing/ Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed• 119.02 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> 09 Yes ❑ No* Is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation'? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g. modem) <br /> ❑ N/A operational? <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate,or is electrically disconnected'? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) ® Sump/Trench Sensors; ®Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ®Yes ❑No <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> ❑ N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed),is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and operating properly'? if so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alai m a i_,gc i ' <br /> ❑Yes* ® No Was any monitoring equipment replaced?If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replacCLI <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section L, below. <br /> ®Yes* ❑ No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> ®Product; ® Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set-upreports, i 'a licable.) <br /> ®Yes ❑ No* Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications'? <br /> *In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: 87 stp sump and dispenser pan #516 small amount of fuel/water mix. Removed to barrel. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.