My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HOSPITAL
>
500
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231614
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2018
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/19/2021 1:54:59 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:50:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2018
RECORD_ID
PR0231614
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0000086
FACILITY_NAME
San Joaquin General Hospital
STREET_NUMBER
500
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HOSPITAL
STREET_TYPE
Rd
City
French Camp
Zip
95231
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
500 W Hospital Rd
P_LOCATION
99
P_DISTRICT
001
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231614_500 W HOSPITAL_2013-2018.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testln cing <br />Software version Installed: <br />Comolete the follow ina checkhsL• <br />Aak RE 4W E C zV aPMM <br />r® PE e B B t SSR e^h a e <br />C'a 2017 <br />® Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />Is the audible alarm operational?n <br />® Yea <br />❑ <br />No' <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />Were all sensors visually Inspected, function* tested, and confirmed operational? <br />® Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />Were all sensors Installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not Interfere with their proper <br />operation? <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ <br />dile' <br />N alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g., modem) operational? <br />® <br />MA <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ <br />No* <br />For pressurized piping systems. does the turbine automatically shut down If the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a teak, <br />IN <br />NIA <br />falls to operate, or is electricallydisconnected? If yes: which sensors Initiate positive shaft -down? (Check ati 6W apply) [3Sumplrrench <br />Sensors [3 Dispenser Sensors. <br />Did you confirm positive shuklown due to leaks go sensor faliureldisconnection? ❑ Yes; ❑ No. <br />❑ Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (Le.. no mechanical overfill prevention valve Is <br />® <br />N/A <br />Installed), Is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fin pant(s) and operating property? If so, at what percent of tank capacity <br />does the alarm trW@r? % <br />❑ Yes <br />® <br />No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, Identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and Ilst the manufacturer name <br />and model for all replacement parts In Section E. Maw. <br />❑Yea• <br />® <br />No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br />❑ Product ❑ Water. if yes, describe causes In Section E, below. <br />® Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />We monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, If applicable <br />® Yes <br />❑ <br />No' <br />Is sli monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? <br />° In Section E below, describe Prow and when these deficiencies were or w IN be carrected. <br />E. Comrda: FLAPPER VALVE IN DROP TUBE _ <br />Monitoring System Carnification Page 2 o14 2/21/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.