COMPLIANCE INFO_2010-2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

CERTIFICATION I TEST DATE: October 10, 2013 Al. FACILITY A2. OWNER ❑ No " Name Olympian # 487 ❑ Yes Name Flyers Energy LLC. Address 983 Moffat Blvd., Manteca, CA 96336 If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring y ring station, Is all communications equipment (e.g. modems) operational? _.........".., I......._..._— --- _ For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? if yes: which sensors initiate positive shutdown? (check all that apply) ❑ SumpfTrench sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failureldisconnection? Address 2360 Lindbergh Street, Auburn, CA 95802 Phone # 530-865-0401 For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention valve is Installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? _ % Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. _ ._..._...... _ _ . _...._....... ....... - Was any liquid found Inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. – Phone # 530-885.0401 Contact Amanda A elt ❑ No* Contact Amanda Ap eit D. RESULTS OF TESTING I SERVICING Make / Model of Monitoring System: Veeder-Root TLS -360 SN# Software Version Installed: Cemnlate the fnllowina checklist: ❑ Yes .........._..._........ ❑ Yes Is the audible alarm operational? _........ -- Is the visual alarm operational? Were all sensors visually Inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? ❑ No " ❑ No* ❑ No " ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No' Were all sensors Installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not Interfere with their proper operation? ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ NIA If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring y ring station, Is all communications equipment (e.g. modems) operational? _.........".., I......._..._— --- _ For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system detects a leak, fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? if yes: which sensors initiate positive shutdown? (check all that apply) ❑ SumpfTrench sensors; ❑ Dispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks and sensor failureldisconnection? ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No " ❑ NIA ❑ No' ❑ Yes ❑ No' ❑ NIA For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention valve is Installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger? _ % Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes, or other equipment replaced and list the manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. _ ._..._...... _ _ . _...._....... ....... - Was any liquid found Inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) ❑ Product; ❑ Water. If yes, describe causes in Section E, below. – ❑ Yes " -- ❑ Yes ❑ No - ❑ No ❑ Yes ❑ Yes ❑ No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to Insure proper settings? Attach set-up reports, If applicable. Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturer's specifications? ❑ No* " in Section E below, describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. iE. COMMENTZ Page 2 of 3