My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2009
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
E
>
ELM
>
124
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0231866
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2006-2009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/15/2020 4:02:36 PM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:53:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2006-2009
RECORD_ID
PR0231866
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003957
FACILITY_NAME
AT&T California - UE020
STREET_NUMBER
124
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
ELM
STREET_TYPE
St
City
Lodi
Zip
95240
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
124 W Elm St
P_LOCATION
02
P_DISTRICT
004
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0231866_124 W ELM_2006-2009.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
483
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
08/19/2008 09:25 8316481924 SPECIAL SERVICES PAGE 03 <br /> Monitoring System Certification <br /> Address: 124 W. ELM ST. LODI 95242 Service Date: 07/30/2008 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed: 122.00 <br /> Complete the fol owing checklist; <br /> ®Yes ❑No* is the audible alarm operational? <br /> ZYes ❑No* Is the visual alarm operational? <br /> %Yes ❑No" Were all the sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and cofirmed operational? <br /> ElYes ❑No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other <br /> equipment will not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> CKYes [—]No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment(e.g. modem) <br /> operational? <br /> ❑N/A <br /> ©Yes ❑No* For inpiping <br /> n systems,does the turbine pa , rithe <br /> tedpry <br /> containment otori9ystemdettects a leak,fails to operate,os electricallYdiisconnc ? <br /> If yes:which sensors <br /> Initiate positive shut- ❑sump/Trench sensors []Dispenser Containment Sensors <br /> ®N/A down?: <br /> Old you confirm positive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? ❑Yes ❑No <br /> ❑Yes ❑No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device(i.e. no <br /> mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the <br /> ra N/A tank fill point(s)and operating properly?if so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm trigger?: <br /> NA <br /> EKYes* ❑No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, identify specific sensors, probes,or other equipment <br /> replaced and fist the manufacturer name and model for all re,.lacement parts in Section E below. <br /> Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? <br /> [--]Yes* ®No If yes,check the type(s)of liquid found and describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> ❑Product ❑Water <br /> XYes El No* Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings?Attach set up reports,if applicable <br /> ®Yes ❑No* I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br /> "In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments <br /> L5 FIRE BOX 794380-208 <br /> L5 FIRE BOX SENSOR WAS INSTALLED AND PROGRAMMED INTO THE VEEDER ROOT SYSTEM, THE L5 <br /> SENSOR WAS THE:ONLY SENSOR TO RE CERTIFIED IN THE SYSTEM AT THIS TIME.ALL OTHER SENSORS AND <br /> ATG WERE CERTIFIED ON 18 JUNE 2008, <br /> Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.