Laserfiche WebLink
Closure Plan <br /> As approved by the SJCPHS-EHD, the Closure Plan included specifications for tank inerting, <br /> removal, and disposal. The soil sampling protocol discussed the locations of soil samples, soil <br /> sampling collection techniques, chain of custody procedures, and laboratory analytical <br /> methodologies. Tank transporter and hazardous waste contractors were also specified. <br /> Excavations and Removal of Tank and Piping <br /> Two excavations, one for the tank and the other for the piping, were dug so that both the tank <br /> and piping could be removed. The depth of the tank excavation was 13 ft below the upper <br /> surface of the asphalt pavement. The piping excavation was 5.5 ft deep and extended northward <br /> from the telecommunication line to the elevated sidewalk. All piping was removed from the tank <br /> and piping excavations except for the piping beneath the elevated sidewalk (Figure 2). This <br /> piping was drained and then sealed with soldered caps. <br /> The tank was visually inspected after it was removed from the tank excavation. No <br /> perforations or holes were evident. As shown in Appendix B and Appendix C, the UST was <br /> transported offsite on October 18, 1990 by Byars Trucking to the Erickson Inc. facility in <br /> Richmond, California. <br /> Soil Samples <br /> In accordance with the closure application specifications, soil samples were jointly collected <br /> by personnel from LLNL and Science Applications International Corporation. Soil sampling <br /> locations are shown in Figure 2. Soil samples 3, 4, and 7 were collected using a hand-held drive <br /> sampler and stainless-steel liners (Figure 2). Samples 2, 5, and 6 were collected from the <br /> backhoe bucket during the excavation using stainless-steel tubes. This was done at the direction <br /> of the SJCPHS-EHD representative because the soil material contained much gravel that <br /> prevented use of the drive sampler. Prior to storage on ice, the stainless-steel tubes were sealed <br /> with teflon sheets, plastic caps, and friction tape. The soil samples were analyzed by Clayton <br /> Environmental Consultants for Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons as Diesel (TEPH- <br /> Diesel) using EPA Extraction Method 3550 combined with EPA Analytical Method 8015. Soil <br /> samples were also analyzed for BTE and X/Purgeable Aromatics using EPA Analytical Method <br /> 8020, which integrates EPA Extraction Method 3550. See Appendix D, E, and F for analytical <br /> results, signed laboratory reports, and chain-of-custody records, respectively. <br /> On June 20, 27, and July 10, 1990, a total of six soil samples were collected and numbered <br /> according to the Closure Plan numbering scheme. As shown in Figure 3: <br /> • June 20—Soil samples 3 and 4 were collected from above the tank at the <br /> fill pipe-tank connection. These samples yielded TEPH-Diesel <br /> concentrations of 4400 and 2300 mg/kg (ppm),respectively. <br /> 3 <br />