My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
H
>
HAMMER
>
3250
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232224
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_1999-2010
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/7/2021 10:42:38 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:56:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
1999-2010
RECORD_ID
PR0232224
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0001877
FACILITY_NAME
AM PM HAMMER/I5 FOOD #83113
STREET_NUMBER
3250
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
HAMMER
STREET_TYPE
LN
City
STOCKTON
Zip
95209
APN
08240009
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
3250 W HAMMER LN
P_LOCATION
01
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
SJGOV\rtan
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\UST\UST_2361_PR0232224_3250 W HAMMER_1999-2010.tif
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
437
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Facility: Hammer 1-5 Arco Page 2 <br /> D. Results of Testing/Servicing <br /> Software Version Installed:325.02 <br /> Complete the following checklist: <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* Is the audible alarm operational? El Outside Audible Alarm? <br /> Z Yes [] No* Is the visual alarm o2erational? <br /> ED Yes El No* Is the print function o2erational? 0 Not installed. <br /> 0 Yes n No* Were all sensors visually inspected,functionally tested,and confirmed operational? <br /> Z Yes F1 No* Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will <br /> not interfere with their proper operation? <br /> n Yes El No* If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) <br /> Z N/A operational? <br /> 0 Yes El No* For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment <br /> ❑ N/A monitoring system detects a leak,fails to operate, or is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate <br /> positive shut-down? (Check all that apply) 0 Sump Sensors; [I Dispenser Containment Sensors. <br /> Did you confirm 2ositive shut-down due to leaks and sensor failure/disconnection? Z Yes; El No. <br /> El Yes El No* For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no <br /> N N/A mechanical overfill prevention valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank <br /> fill point(s)and o2erating proper!X? If so,at what percent of tank capacity does the alarm triager? <br /> E]Yes* Z No Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes,identify specific sensors,probes,or other equipment replaced <br /> and list the manufacturer name and model for all re2lacement parts in Section E,below. <br /> n Yes* Z No Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) <br /> El Product; Q Water. If yes,describe causes in Section E,below. <br /> 0 Yes El No* .Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settinas?Attach set up reports, if applicable <br /> 0 Yes 0 No* Is all monitorina equi2mento perational per manufacturer'Ls2ecifications? <br /> * In Section E below,describe how and when these deficiencies were or will be corrected. <br /> E. Comments: No Deficiencies. <br /> Page 2 of 3 03/01 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.