My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2016
EnvironmentalHealth
>
EHD Program Facility Records by Street Name
>
Y
>
YOSEMITE
>
1777
>
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
>
PR0232397
>
COMPLIANCE INFO_2013-2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/18/2023 9:06:11 AM
Creation date
6/3/2020 9:56:51 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
EHD - Public
ProgramCode
2300 - Underground Storage Tank Program
File Section
COMPLIANCE INFO
FileName_PostFix
2013-2016
RECORD_ID
PR0232397
PE
2361
FACILITY_ID
FA0003978
FACILITY_NAME
KAISER FOUNDATION - MANTECA
STREET_NUMBER
1777
Direction
W
STREET_NAME
YOSEMITE
STREET_TYPE
AVE
City
MANTECA
Zip
95337
APN
20018034
CURRENT_STATUS
01
SITE_LOCATION
1777 W YOSEMITE AVE
P_LOCATION
04
P_DISTRICT
003
QC Status
Approved
Scanner
KBlackwell
Supplemental fields
FilePath
\MIGRATIONS\Y\YOSEMITE\1777\PR0232397\MODIFICATION APPROVAL PLAN 2014.PDF
QuestysFileName
MODIFICATION APPROVAL PLAN 2014
QuestysRecordDate
11/16/2016 4:57:02 PM
QuestysRecordID
3258884
QuestysRecordType
12
QuestysStateID
1
Tags
EHD - Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
499
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
D. Results of Testing/Semicing <br />Software Version Installed: 130.01 <br />Comolets the following checklist: <br />0 RECD AUG 05 2015 <br />Yes <br />F] No* <br />Is the audible alarm operational? <br />seyes <br />F-1 No* <br />Is the visual alarm operational? <br />dyes <br />Na` <br />Were all sensors visually inspected, functionally tested, and confirmed operational? <br />QYes <br />F No* <br />Were all sensors installed at lowest point of secondary containment and positioned so that other equipment will not interfere with their <br />DroDer eration? <br />Lyes <br />No" <br />If alarms are relayed to a remote monitoring station, is all communications equipment (e.g. modem) operational? <br />d <br />N/A <br />E]Yes <br />No* <br />For pressurized piping systems, does the turbine automatically shut down if the piping secondary containment monitoring system <br />�/ N/A <br />MWs a leak, fails to operatg—gr is electrically disconnected? If yes: which sensors initiate positive shut -down? (Check ad thatappiy) <br />Lj <br />L-5ump/Trench Senses ispenser Containment Sensors. Did you confirm positive shut -down due to leaks anted sensor <br />failure/disconnection? L` -'files; o. <br />Yes <br />For tank systems that utilize the monitoring system as the primary tank overfill warning device (i.e. no mechanical overfill prevention <br />8No* <br />N/A <br />valve is installed), is the overfill warning alarm visible and audible at the tank fill point(s) and operating properly? If so, at what percent <br />of tank capacity does the alarm tri er? 90 <br />Lyes'— <br />JVJ No <br />Was any monitoring equipment replaced? If yes, iden'ify specific sensors, profs, or other equipment replaced and list the <br />manufacturer name and model for all replacement parts in Section E, below. <br />LjYes* <br />I./I No <br />Was liquid found inside any secondary containment systems designed as dry systems? (Check all that apply) roduct; ater. If <br />es, describe causes in Section E below. <br />�/ es <br />No* <br />I Was monitoring system set-up reviewed to ensure proper settings? Attach set up reports, if applicable <br />= es <br />No* <br />I Is all monitoring equipment operational per manufacturers specifications? <br />... vvvr.vo• r .s v.v r� a.wve.w.r ..v rr wr.w rr..w• r..w� ay.•v.v�.v.w yr v. v v ra.s. ry <br />E. Comments: <br />Monitoring System Certification Page 2 of 4 12/07 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.