COMPLIANCE INFO_2009-2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

M n n SWRCB, January 2002 Page '2—of ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6)) 4. TANK ANNULAR TESTING Test Method Developed By: Hank Manufacturer 0 Industry Standard 0 Professional Engineer ❑ er (Specify) Test Method Used: 0 Pressure acuum ❑ Other, (Spec) 0 Hydrostatic Test Equipment Used: C--'s+V as ' taw (%u- A4 Tank # ank # Is Tank Exempt From Testing?t ❑YesNo ❑ Yes ❑ No Equipment Resolution: 3 4 ank # ank # t ❑ Yes 0 No \0 Yes ❑ No Tank Capacity: p� ll sx,� Tank Material:/ Tank Manufacturer: 0u�„1S Product Stored: Wait time between applying pressure/ uu ater and starting test: LK Test Start Time: 12- t 30 Initial Reading (Rj): — t o Test End Time: `'. 3 U Final Reading (RF): �„ l Test Duration: Change in Reading (RF -RI): Pass/Fail Threshold or Criteria: IQ 0 La l s ;w T.e Resulx: Pass ❑ Fail 0 Piss: Fail O P ss. Fail Piss ❑ VAII Was sensor removed for testing? 0 Yes XNo ❑ NA 0 Yes ❑ No NA ❑ s❑ NoVONA Yes 0 No NA Was sensor properly replaced and verified functional after testing? ❑ Yes 0 No �tA 0Yes ❑No A Yes 0 No /DYes ❑ No ❑ A Comments— (include information on repairs made prior to testing, and recommended ollow-up.6 rfailed tests) ' Secondary containment systems where the continuous monitoring automatically monitors both the primary and secondary containment, such as systems that are hydrostatically monitored or under constant vacuum, are exempt from periodic containment testing. {California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 2637(a)(6))