Laserfiche WebLink
Michael Kith [EH] <br /> From: Scott Forbess <SForbess@Geosyntec.com> <br /> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2018 2:11 PM <br /> To: Linda Turkatte [EH] <br /> Cc: Michael Kith [EH]; Roger_Smith@oxy.com; Nicole Gotberg; Mike Cramer <br /> Subject: RE:Issue with permit numbers WP0038566 and WP0038567 <br /> Dear Ms. Turkatte, <br /> I had further discussions with Mr. Michael Kith this morning in which he cited the California Department of <br /> Water Resources California Well Standards as a basis for requiring the grout seal to be poured. We have <br /> reviewed the sections cited by Mr. Kith and they do not justify the requirements being placed upon us. Mr. <br /> Kith referenced sections of Bulletin 74-81, Water Well Standards, which was first issued in 1968 and updated <br /> in 1981. In 1986 the California Legislature amended the California Water Code specifically to include <br /> requirements for monitoring well standards. Monitoring wells were previously assumed by the Department to <br /> be covered by the collective term "well" in the law. Bulletin 74-90 updated the California Well Standards to <br /> provide standards for monitoring wells. Bulletin 74-90, Part II Monitoring Well Construction, Section 9. Sealing <br /> the Upper Annual Space, Part F. Placement of the Annual Seal Material does not state that sealing for a <br /> monitoring well needs to be conducted in a single continuous lift. This section does say additional discussion <br /> on placement of annular seals can be found in Section 9, Section 13, and Appendix B, of the Water Well <br /> Standards. <br /> Monitoring Wells Standards are defined separately from Water Well Standards in the California Well <br /> Standards per the 1986 changes to the California Water Code. Water Wells are defined in the California Well <br /> Standards as ""any artificial excavation constructed by any method for the purpose of extracting water from <br /> or injecting water into the underground". Monitoring wells are defined in the California Well Standards as <br /> "any artificial excavation by any method for the purpose of monitoring fluctuations in groundwater levels, <br /> quality of underground waters, or the concentration of contaminants in underground waters." Section 9, <br /> Section 13, and Appendix B, all apply to Water Wells, not Monitoring Wells. Even though these standards no <br /> not apply to monitoring well, it is of note that even in Appendix B of the Water Well Standards "suggested <br /> methods for sealing the annual space" provides allowance for the seal to be placed in lifts when the Water <br /> Well annular seal is more than 100 feet deep. <br /> Also note the Monitoring Well Standards Section 12, Part A.1 state that for monitoring wells special <br /> consideration should be given to the selection of the well casing material for chemical compatibility with the <br /> environment that the monitoring wells are installed in. Due to the presence of potentially corrosive ammonia <br /> concentrations in groundwater in the area, PVC casing was selected for the design of the project monitoring <br /> wells. <br /> During a discussion on Friday, August 8th, Mr. Kith indicated that County may allow the seal to be placed in <br /> multiple lifts if Geosyntec was willing to certify that constructing the well in this manner was protective of <br /> groundwater and consistent with the California Well Standards. Geosyntec is willing to have a licensed <br /> professional in the State of California make this certification. <br /> 1 <br />